The numbers are out there. You haven't bothered to look them up so you have half an idea what you're talking about.
That's odd. Just a few days ago you were bullshitting me that the authors of the modeling study that you posted could not do a stats-based study because there were no stats.
Because modeling who might have died of covid but didn't - instead of using the stats you claim they should have but can't produce - is exactly the same as counting the bodies of dead kids.
What a stupid question.
The numbers are out there. You haven't bothered to look them up so you have half an idea what you're talking about. No need, I guess.
I was just wondering if you'd given any thought to how many dead youths it would take to make a dent on your thinking.
That's odd. Just a few days ago you were bullshitting me that the authors of the modeling study that you posted could not do a stats-based study because there were no stats.
Because modeling who might have died of covid but didn't - instead of using the stats you claim they should have but can't produce - is exactly the same as counting the bodies of dead kids.
If you say so...
Modeling who might have died is better than actual data. Right.
And you're the one who's always moaning about deflection.
When it’s appropriate to ridicule the hypocrisy.