Denmark ends mRNA injections for almost everyone under 50.
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
They're like seat belts. They help. 17 August 2022 "The scientific fundamentals and applicability of SAfE Transport have been validated in this case study, which demonstrates that mask wearing substantially reduces impact on COVID-19 transmission, with at least 80% coverage levels in a 7-day time period." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07664-0#Sec12
From your own link: "the “CDC continues to recommend that any mask is better than no mask"
There's something to be said for not having the hospitals plugged with covid patients, because people get sick from other things too.
No they're not. There is a standard with seat belts. We have 50 years data on seat belts. People are not prevented from entering Canada for not wearing a seat belt.
“I don’t understand the CDC’s recommendations for this,” Brosseau said. “My guess is that there’s a lot of political pressure. And no government agency is entirely immune from political pressure.” -Lisa Brosseau, ScD, nationally recognized expert on infectious diseases
Hospitals are plugged up mostly by preventable things, that have no mandates, like engorging with fat and sugar, and sedentary behavior.
Most of the people hospitalized are elderly vaccinated. Why are they allowed to travel?
We have centuries of data on communicable diseases.
She says there are better strategies than cloth masks. She does not say, as you would like to claim, that cloth masks are useless. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2022/03/white-house-diverges-cdc-focuses-aerosol-covid-spread
Your theories are noted. They don't address the fact that prior to covid the hospitals provided a certain level of care, and since covid appeared they have struggled to regain that level. Reducing the covid load on the healthcare system moves us closer.
The vaccinated elderly hospitalized don't travel, and the ones who aren't hospitalized aren't sick.
If your side would share the data they're basing their current and previous policy off, that would mean something.
Until we see the secret data, which proves the PHAC meta-report wrong, I'm going to stick with the PHAC position.
Refusing to provide important data is suspicious.
No wrong again. 1:52, she says "cloth masks don't work in any form"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cRuA9EizBM&t=113s
Wrong, not an opinion, fact. Publicly available data from statscan. Hospitals have been overwhelmed by obesity and opioid "epidemics" for years. Everyone knows this and I've linked sources. Do I need to re-link the data every time you make the same false claim?
Elderly and obese are the highest risk group regardless of vaccination status. Preventing a healthy 20 y/o from entering because of "risk" to the healthcare system, while simultaneously allowing an elderly vaccinated elderly person makes no sense if your policy is intended to protect hospital capacity.
Further why is our healthcare system so weak it can't handle allowing unvaccinated travelers to enter, when the vast majority of countries have no problem with this.
Show me the data you're looking for from anywhere else in the world.
That's from Apr 25, 2020. In March of this year she referred to them - see my earlier link - as inefficient, not useless, while contending that better technology was required.
You can pretend covid did not have a major effect on the healthcare system, resulting in a major reduction of normally available services. The rest of us know what happened.
The unvaccinated should not be exposed to them because they take up more resources when they get sick.
You talk as though there are only two scenarios: those that do and those that don't. In reality there are four levels of screening and only 45% allow free access with no follow-up once you land. https://www.ca.kayak.com/travel-restrictions?