Nope, and anyone who follows the link you provided will see that's not what I said. You can't see it because you haven't learned English well enough yet, so you can't recognize subtleties of meaning.
You keep demonstrating you have only the vaguest idea what NACI stated, and the fact that you never correct yourself shows you won't or can't (my money's on "can't") find the statement to see what it really says.
It's the lobby group for the airline industry. From your link: "Our mission is to represent, lead & serve the airline industry" https://www.iata.org/en/
Of course they're going to downplay anything that keeps bums out of airline seats.
Your comparing the volume of a single Airbus A350 with the volume of a basketball arena or two. Furthermore the airplane recirculates the air.
I hope that helps you understand.
But you personally wanted to ban the healthy who test negative and allow the elderly and obese who are infectious.
I hope this helps expose you as the ignorant obese propagandist hypocrite you are.
Public health guidelines are easy to follow. You do it all the time.
You don’t deny being an irrational, vindictive Covid Nazi. You wear it proudly.
Noted.
Folks, this may be a record for proving Godwin's law correct.
You are refusing to get murderna boosted every 90 days.
Not so safe and not effective at all, isn’t it TwoChodes.
If only you could find that thing you think you understand.
And none of your friends are helping you.
You wrote on Omega that you didn’t want to be injected with experimental mRNA every 90 days. here
Your experts are saying your vaccines wane after 2 months. Studies show COVID-19 immunity from Pfizer vaccine wanes after 2 months.
Your CDC experts told you to recharge your immune system as soon as the Pfizer and Murderna’s products wane. They instructed you TwoChodes.
And your NACI experts told you to recharge often, because getting mRNA shots every 90 days is safe.
And you are refusing TwoChodes.
It’s quite simple. I can repeat it and dumb it down for you.
Nope, and anyone who follows the link you provided will see that's not what I said. You can't see it because you haven't learned English well enough yet, so you can't recognize subtleties of meaning.
Why did you leave out the rest of the quote from your link? The part that says immunity "drops off after about two months, although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death holds strong." https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2021/10/07/covid19-pfizer-vaccine-immunity-wanes-studies/2881633626128/
Boosters. Yep.
Nope.
You keep demonstrating you have only the vaguest idea what NACI stated, and the fact that you never correct yourself shows you won't or can't (my money's on "can't") find the statement to see what it really says.
Liberal politicians' guesses/gut feelings = The Science.
Study presented to government by PHAC = Dangerous Disinformation.
That's why masks are needed on planes and trains but not in Parliament.
https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2020-10-08-02/
Your opinions are noted, and the IATA is mandated to look after the airlines' bottom line, not the public good.
Not an opinion, meta study presented by the Canadian top authority to the government, linked here multiple times.
You’re not “trusting the science” you’re trusting the Liberals over the science.
It's the lobby group for the airline industry. From your link: "Our mission is to represent, lead & serve the airline industry" https://www.iata.org/en/
Of course they're going to downplay anything that keeps bums out of airline seats.
Okay here is the study PHAC presented to the government, that you’re saying is wrong:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233548/
2021 Jun 26
Long before omicron appeared.
Catch up.
Reminder neither Canada's top epidemiologist or PHAC recommended the vaccine mandates on planes or trains.
She indicated this on record, under oath.
Of course this contradicts the ongoing Liberal lies.
It does perfectly explain the Liberals refusal to provide evidence backing up "The Science".
The recommendations were for confined spaces.
No they weren’t recommended at all, as stated by PHAC top epidemiologist under oath.
You want me to link the court transcript again?
Sure. I'll show you what's wrong with your interpretation of it.