Who made up the “safe and effective” lie?
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
That's kind of a dumb question folks. Efficacy is "Power or capacity to produce a desired effect; effectiveness." https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=efficacy+definition&ia=definition
The desired result was reducing harm from the virus. Pfizer's vaccine does that: "When Pfizer-BioNTech applied for FDA authorization for its vaccine in December 2020, its initial Phase 3 clinical data surpassed expectations with 95% efficacy, based on an independent analysis by the FDA. But data on real-world effectiveness for adults shows that the protection from the mRNA two-dose primary series wanes over time; however, a booster dose (for those who are eligible) brings the immune system back to robust levels." Oct 12, 2022 https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison
Lol you just cemented your status as an illiterate fat Covid Nazi.
Your opinion as an illiterate fat Covid Nazi is worthless. Follow your experts, recharge your immune system with mRNA every 90 days. That’s all we want, for you to get boosted, often and soon.
Do you make up these unattributed quotes all by yourself?
Only the triple and quadruple vaccinated and double masked are terrified of Covid.
Covid Nazi’s know their vaccines are useless, ineffective, and remain terrified of the sniffles.
If you weren’t fat, uneducated and triple-RNA altered with LNPs, high cholesterol and Spikes rotting your brain and vascular system, you’d currently have a stronger immune system.
Folks, V&C1 comes up with this unsupported nonsense pretty regularly. She's fast to say it but never comes up with an authoritative source.
She rarely comes up with any support at all, and when she does it's pretty low grade, often anonymous, and never peer reviewed science.
Oh no, the abysmal ARR % of the covid vaccines was never posted on Reddit, so the fat Covid Nazi thinks that this public Pfizer trial data can’t possibly be true. Ooh nooo
Also as an uneducated Covid Nazi, you have no idea what ARR means or what the formals is. Aww
Folks, V&C1 comes up with this unsupported nonsense pretty regularly. She's fast to say it but never comes up with an authoritative source.
She rarely comes up with any support at all, and when she does it's pretty low grade, often anonymous, and never peer reviewed science.
It seems to me like people read too far into the vaccine and made assumptions and just rolled with them.
The only people claiming it granted immunity were politicians, health ministers etc. Even while the vaccine was being developed, back in the first few months, I recall reading that it was to be what was called a "leaky vaccine" in that it did not prevent transmission - but there was probably some buyer's remorse and political figureheads couldn't just say what you were saying because most people wouldn't understand that.
You left out the subject matter experts who all agreed it reduced the damage from the virus.
Who? An infectious disease specialist? Or an Alex Jones who wanted to sell you some powders?
Immunologists went with this. It's not complicated. Vaccine and treatment leakage is credited with giving us patient zero for omicron in South Africa. An immunocompromised person whose system just couldn't purge the remaining reservoirs of virus after treatment with monoclonal antibodies. Natural selection being what it is, we got what we got.
Do you not recall the many Marek's allegories or are you just gaslighting?
Folks, why would anyone believe any of this? There's not a single link to back up anything claimed.
I was talking about, specifically, the people who claimed it granted immunity - IE, that it was a sterilizing vaccine. From what I understand, no vaccine manufacturer ever claimed that it did - someone or something just invented that part and ran with it and that spread like crazy.
And from where I read it, I think in March 2020 when everyone was starting to nail plexiglass to everything I heard it in a brief somewhere, an outlet that reported on biology papers. I remember from the very early onset that people interested in the vaccine knew full well that it was not going to be sterilizing.
Calm down there, buddy, I know they were claiming it was for harm reduction, I think the more rational standpoint is that the harm reduction to cost ratio ended up being really poor because everyone was freaked out and they threw their clemency out the window for a bit. The money spent on that vaccine regarding harm reduction could have been spent on something deadlier like car accidents if they actually wanted to reduce deaths.
OK. I apologize.