And you are using this element of the process to discredit a legally required reporting system that can lead to people getting correct care so once again trying to "throw baby out with the bathwater" and attempting to discredit A legally required reporting system.
And you are using this element of the process to discredit a legally required reporting system that can lead to people getting correct care so once again trying to "throw baby out with the bathwater" and attempting to discredit A legally required reporting system.
You continue to talk only of the legal requirements for the healthcare community.
You continue to ignore the well-documented abuse of the side of the reporting system that is open to absolutely anyone.
You are free of course to maintain your wilful ignorance of this abuse.
For the rest of the folks who are interested in knowing how VAERS is being abused, here are a couple of descriptions of the problem:
"Anti-vaxxers show how a precious vaccine adverse event reporting database can be used to scare the public" https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-health/dont-fall-vaers-scare-tactic
"The public database of reported post-vaccination health issues is often misused to sow misinformation." https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
And this is a great example of disinformation. No stats just personal opinion pieces by propagadists.
How many of the reports are by these so called "false reporters"?
Thank you for acknowledging that the VAERS system is open to abuse.
I didn't acknowledge that. You have proven that your sources are showing disingenuous artifacts from a system to discredit it.
Where is the Ombudsman report on VAERS accuracy?
Some journalist student fan fiction isn't real reporting.