Which one? The one that used to agree with the rest of them until his 73 year old father died six months after getting a vaccine, or the one that's made shaky predictions in the past and is now undergoing disciplinary hearings?
It is always the case with tyrannies that those who speak the truth are prosecuted. We are version 2.0 of Soviet Russia where dissidents were diagnosed as having a form of schizophrenia, the chief symptom of which was speaking out against the regime. Now we are not quite as ham fisted. Instead of sending people to the Gulag we destroy their professions and livelihoods or we deplatform them so that they cannot be heard and then the tuchidiots can talk about consensus among the profession.
I don't know what you do for a living, but if you and a thousand others doing the same thing had to deal with a single colleague who was calling you all out publicly for the harm they claimed you were causing people, you would react exactly the same way. Because you're human.
We are version 2.0 of Soviet Russia
You should try writing for Harlequin. They love pearl-clutching.
You and a bunch of other people here need to spend some time considering the concept of yelling 'Fire" in a crowded theatre before you know for a fact there's a fire. You keep telling each other there is, but never produce any proof.
So far all you've offered is journalists' opinions and years old information. Without some reference to material that backs up your claims you're just talking in order to listen to yourself.
Which one? The one that used to agree with the rest of them until his 73 year old father died six months after getting a vaccine, or the one that's made shaky predictions in the past and is now undergoing disciplinary hearings?
It is always the case with tyrannies that those who speak the truth are prosecuted. We are version 2.0 of Soviet Russia where dissidents were diagnosed as having a form of schizophrenia, the chief symptom of which was speaking out against the regime. Now we are not quite as ham fisted. Instead of sending people to the Gulag we destroy their professions and livelihoods or we deplatform them so that they cannot be heard and then the tuchidiots can talk about consensus among the profession.
I don't know what you do for a living, but if you and a thousand others doing the same thing had to deal with a single colleague who was calling you all out publicly for the harm they claimed you were causing people, you would react exactly the same way. Because you're human.
You should try writing for Harlequin. They love pearl-clutching.
You and a bunch of other people here need to spend some time considering the concept of yelling 'Fire" in a crowded theatre before you know for a fact there's a fire. You keep telling each other there is, but never produce any proof.
So far all you've offered is journalists' opinions and years old information. Without some reference to material that backs up your claims you're just talking in order to listen to yourself.
[Unsupported Tuchodic opinion]
Make yourself meaningful enough to warrant a research study or an academic paper.