Pandemics occur now and again, about every hundred years on average: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/history-of-pandemics-deadliest/
In 2005 Bush predicted a pandemic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spcj6KUr4aA
In 2014 Obama predicted a pandemic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBVAnaHxHbM
2008 - "the likelihood of a flu pandemic in the next 50 years approaches 100%" - a review of 'Global Catastrophes and Trends' - Vaclav Smil https://vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/smil-bookreview-global-catastrophes20080000-predicting-the-future.pdf
2012 - "David Quammen speculates that there would indeed be a new disease, likely from the coronavirus family, coming out of a bat, and it would likely emerge in or around a wet market in China." - 'Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic' - https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/how-it-feels-to-predict-a-pandemic-interview-with-david-quammen-author-of-spillover/
2017 - A scenario that encourages public health agencies to prepare. 'SPARS Pandemic Scenario' https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html
2017 - "a dismal introduction on the threat of epidemics" 'Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs' - Michael T. Osterholm and Mark Olshaker
2019 - "We assess that the United States and the world will remain vulnerable to the next flu pandemic or large-scale outbreak of a contagious disease that could lead to massive rates of death and disability, severely affect the world economy, strain international resources, and increase calls on the United States for support" WORLDWIDE THREAT ASSESSMENT of the US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY - https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019-ATA-SFR---SSCI.pdf
As usual folks these personal opinions are unsupported by any authority.
What links would those be?
Got any facts?
The numbers are easily found: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus, https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
Those claims are easily supported, and they show that unvaccinated people run the risk of being hit harder when they eventually pick up the virus: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235, https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/421-010-CasesInNotFullyVaccinated.pdf, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status, https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-effectiveness, https://www.contagionlive.com/view/covid-19-hospitalizations-broken-down-by-vaccination-status, https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/, https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/covid-19-breakthrough-data
The fat boomer admitted the triple vaxed are dying off even FASTER and IN HIGHER NUMBERS than the double vaxed. The more the boosters, the higher the odds of death.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15IrGIVyaa/vaccine-status-is-irrelevant--ol/c/
The triple vaxxed are older than the double vaxxed. Older people die more often than younger people. Simple.
Actually you obstuse fat cell I do.
So regarding the links to Wuhan. The epicenter of the outbreak is within a few hundred meters of a virology lab where, before the Wuhan virus escape, the scientists were publishing papers about the gain of function research they were doing on bat coronoviruses specifically aimed at making them more infectious to humans.
Chinese virology labs are known to have extremely lax safety standards, so much so that State Department officials who had toured that lab during the Obama administration sent an urgent cable home warning of an imminent escape. Indeed Chinese biolabs are known to have leaked and caused localized outbreaks of Sars 1 on three previous occasions.
Furthermore, the virus shows characteristics of bioengineering, including gene sequences from 1) the hiv virus and 2) a gene sequence patented by moderna, years before the Wuhan virus, not found in nature. The odds of these things happening randomly are astronomically improbable. Furthermore the location of the outbreak next to the very lab working on genetically modifying a bat coronavirus to make it more infectious to humans speaks for itself. It would be like finding a pollutant produced by a specific factory downstream of the river where that factory sits and nowhere upstream.
Regarding the odds of dying, the odds are not evenly distributed and affect mostly the aged and the fat like you. For other people the odds of serious issues are much less than 1 percent. They made it sound like it was apocalyptic. Now that the world has moved on, and the media is no longer hyping it, you don't see the apocalyptic claims of the winter of death and other nonsense which in itself tells you that it was mostly hype.
Regarding the MRNA therarpy, it clearly does not prevent transmission. It does not reduce risk and you do not and cannot factor in the consequences of this therapy. There has been a significant rise in excess deaths in all jurisdictions that had mass vaccination campaigns, and the rise in deaths correlates with the mass adoption of the mrna vaccines. Vaccines usually undergo years of testing and most are not approved due to safety concerns. These mrna vaccines did not undergo long term testing. Apart from the obvious evidence of risks associated with them, your basic tuchidiocy is in shifting the burden of proof. It is not for me to prove them unsafe. They have not been proven safe.
See folks? Not a single link.
Just unsupported opinions from someone you don't know.
Don't take medical advice from anonymous people on social media. Get it from known medical experts.
You see, you mentally deficient, you seem to be unaware of the obvious. A pathetic postule feeding on the reddit pablum letting your fat brain get worked on by their echo chamber.
Well here we go: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/
https://archive.ph/dvlSg (moderna gene sequence.)
From 2004: "Breaches of safety regulations are probable cause of recent SARS outbreak, WHO says"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC416634/
And here is an article from 2010 by one of the top virologists at the Wuhan lab talking about the work they were doing on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab. There are dozens others https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6
I would provide more links, but why don't you educate yourself instead of being a smug ignoramus.
You don't have very high standards for your sources, and you're happy to claim as fact things which are actually speculation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTRKCXC0JFg
Come on! A newspaper journalist's opinion from over two and a half years ago? Viruses have been crossing over from animals to humans for thousands of years (https://omegacanada.win/p/16ZXVZ8nuH/it-was-no-secret-a-pandemic-was-/) and this is the best you can do to support your story that covid is different? There is actually more current speculation out there, but it is still speculation, because a little time on the Internet will tell you that they still don't actually know where the virus came from. So until proof arrives one way or the other you could be right, but you're so in love with your own opinions that you can't admit that no one actually knows.
Another news article by a journalist who is currently doing movie reviews: https://muckrack.com/connor-boyd. Very scientific. It is a highly speculative news piece based on an equally speculative study by an eye doctor which admits "a portion of a reverse complement sequence being present in SARS-CoV-2 could be a random coincidence" https://archive.ph/Yuw2m
This 2004 incident, which killed one unfortunate person - and was not the cause of the 2002 SARS pandemic because the incident occurred later, in case anyone gets the wrong idea - is one of many biolab accidents. Here is a list of 52 of them from over a dozen different countries, 18 of which occurred in the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_laboratory_biosecurity_incidents.
What is missing - as mentioned earlier - is any actual proof that it was a lab leak, but that doesn't stop you from accepting it as a proven fact, and promoting it as such.
Another journalist. The story is that in examining the effect of different versions of a virus some mice got sicker than others, and a scientist from a funding institution pointed out that his organization should have been informed about it. Here is the letter: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/nih-eco-health-alliance-letter/512f5ee70ce9c67c/full.pdf
The reporter - whose medical qualifications remain unknown - calls it "gain of function" research but does not explain why she thinks it fits that definition. GOF is certainly not mentioned in the letter.
The hunt for the source of the original SARS outbreak in 2002 started immediately. Many bio-safety labs were working on it, for example in Singapore: http://www.china.org.cn/english/2003/Oct/78627.htm. The fact that the lab in Wuhan was too is pretty ho-hum.