WE can read this part, can't we folks? "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Speaking of understanding folks, what part of this do you think she's having trouble with: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Folks perhaps the problem is that she's unaware of the importance of the peer review process. Predatory academic publishing is a thing now (https://libguides.usask.ca/predatorypublishers).As a result peer review is more important than ever. It hasn't been that long since I became aware of it myself.
It says, in part: "Peer review has been in existence as a means of assessing the content before publication for more than 300 years. Possibly, it goes to the credit of the Royal Society that introduced peer review in Philosophical Transactions in 1752."
WE can read this part, can't we folks? "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Did you Google a POLITICO fact check yet?
I'm going to leave that to her folks. She's the one posting those: https://omegacanada.win/p/16Zqmvz1XB/far-leftist-rag-politico--meet-t/
TUCHIDIOT, you who googles POLITICO to know what medical experiment you should participate in. Only you.
Everyone else here makes fun of POLITICO.
https://omegacanada.win/p/16Zqmvz1XB/far-leftist-rag-politico--meet-t/
Only Fat boomers follow Politico for medical advice.
And yet she's the one posting Politico pages: https://omegacanada.win/p/16Zqmvz1XB/far-leftist-rag-politico--meet-t/
It's a mystery to me folks.
Do you think she's one of those "Fat boomer"s?
Maybe she's trying to tell us something.
Exactly.
You didn’t read or understand the study.
Speaking of understanding folks, what part of this do you think she's having trouble with: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Thank you for confirming you are stupid to understand a clinic study!
Warning
The fat boomer endorses research that is not reproducible.
The fat boomer relies on POLITICO fact checkers for medical advice.
The fat boomer wants research to have preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma.
https://www.pacificresearch.org/the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility/ https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/04/13/corruption-of-nih-peer-review/ https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-top-journal-editors-get-paid-by-big-pharma-corrupt https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-often-hidden-problems-with-peer-review-research/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
Folks perhaps the problem is that she's unaware of the importance of the peer review process. Predatory academic publishing is a thing now (https://libguides.usask.ca/predatorypublishers).As a result peer review is more important than ever. It hasn't been that long since I became aware of it myself.
Here is a paper that would help her if she read it: http://eprints.rclis.org/39332/1/26964-465493240-1-PB.pdf
It says, in part: "Peer review has been in existence as a means of assessing the content before publication for more than 300 years. Possibly, it goes to the credit of the Royal Society that introduced peer review in Philosophical Transactions in 1752."
You’re old and you’re fat.
Get Boosted Covid Nazi. Your survival rate for the common cold is very low. Better get all the boosters you can. Get your sudden death booster juice.