You seem to be conjoining peer review with truthfulness which any 4th graders afterschool special will tell you is not a good way to judge truth. Whats popular isnt always right whats right isnt always popular.
You even said one thing a non-PR study is is potentially useful, yet you dismiss because it doesnt have the outset approval of those who face no consequence for it being wrong or duplicitous. People who, its been mentioned many many times, have a vested interest in one particular course of action.
You seem to be conjoining peer review with truthfulness which any 4th graders afterschool special will tell you is not a good way to judge truth. Whats popular isnt always right whats right isnt always popular.
You even said one thing a non-PR study is is potentially useful, yet you dismiss because it doesnt have the outset approval of those who face no consequence for it being wrong or duplicitous. People who, its been mentioned many many times, have a vested interest in one particular course of action.
Dont forget to get your booster.
Please tell the folks why all non-peer-reviewed papers are just as valid as peer-reviewed.