And until that consensus is reached the study "should not be used to guide clinical practice".
Every study that you posted that does not explicitly say that it was peer-reviewed was the original study and not peer-reviewed. And, yes, criticizing a study because it is not peer-reviewed is a low-intelligence criticism.
I won’t criticize the bullshit studies that you post for not being peer-reviewed because i’m not a retard. I’ll criticize the actual bullshit in the bad studies.
Every study that you posted that does not explicitly say that it was peer-reviewed was the original study and not peer-reviewed. And, yes, criticizing a study because it is not peer-reviewed is a low-intelligence criticism.
In your dreams.
https://libanswers.unm.edu/faq/162384
https://guides.library.oregonstate.edu/c.php?g=285842&p=1906145
Pointing out that a study warns against immediately using its findings is not a criticism. It's a quote.
your links here confirm everything that i just told you.
Except for the bullshit parts, like:
I won’t criticize the bullshit studies that you post for not being peer-reviewed because i’m not a retard. I’ll criticize the actual bullshit in the bad studies.