I've answered that question on 900 years at this point you need to disprove what i said or accept it. It's my belief. I read of it so it's true to me.

You apologise for the German governments medical policies during the second world war period and are trying to distance their complicity in those policies by pretending that "those policies were from the Nazis" like it was done in isolation and not implemented nationwide. Is your position that it was okay to protect those medical professionals that blindly followed orders during that time as not culpable in some way? Did they not posses free will? Do you like the policies? You never answered my question; were the policies to force medical procedures, tattoo identies on the arms and base the ability to function in society on a health pass not evil?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297275/

What is it called when you discriminated against the religious beliefs of a person or group by using slurs to discredit their beliefs as you "set the goalpost" in the beginning? It's obvious you feel it's okay to discriminate against Christians and subtly against Jews. When you do a google search of "goat herder" do you know what comes up? Sure you do. One of the associated slurs is "goat [expletive]". It's common that when using "goat herder" it is to imply the second term.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goat%20Herder

Jews were well known in the time of the Bible to be strongly "goat herders" and proudly such. But few goat herders were educated enough to be scholars or academics who would have been able to capture the words in any great form and more importantly protect those words from destruction. By using slurs to try to diminish the value of the work or to discredit the people who follow the text you show your true beliefs. There is no proof that John was a goat herder. But he could read and write which at the time no goat herder could do.

https://evidenceforchristianity.org/were-people-literate-in-the-time-of-jesus-r/

If literacy at the time of Jesus was around 3% then those like John that could write letters and collect thoughts were highly treasured assets and would have been protected. No "goat herder".

So by using those terms what was your intention? Is it directed hate toward adherents to the Christian faith that drives you or some other reason you posted this misinformation?

You obviously just repeated hate you heard before like it was true.

What is the intention of Revelation? Here's some detail:

The theme of Revelation is the revelation of the person and the prophetic program of Jesus Christ. Many purposes can be detected in the book.

First, it was written to encourage believers to endure persecution and to persevere through suffering, knowing that the victory of Christ over the world and the Devil is guaranteed and certain.

Second, the book was written to show how all of prophecy focuses on Jesus Christ, His person and His program for the world.

Third, the book seeks to unite all the various lines of biblical prophecy (both Old and New Testaments), and to show how they converge upon the second coming of Christ to rule the earth in His messianic kingdom.

Fourth, the book seeks to correct some moral and doctrinal problems that existed (and still exist), in the churches, and to instruct Christians in such things as salvation, prophecy, the person of Christ, and Christian living.

And finally, the book may be an attack of the paganism and emperor worship of the Roman Empire, particularly against the emperor Domitian and his persecution of Christians. (There are many possible veiled references to the anti-Christian nature and activities of Rome in the book).

So to your question:

What makes you so sure the Book of Revelation is talking about our current era, given that the claim has been wrong before?

You offer no proof that the "claim has been wrong before". On what basis? The Bible can be considered witness and warning to future generations and as such is the most treasured tome in history.

Literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong and hateful. Everyone who cherry picks a line or discredit the authors of the Bible with bad intentions are spreading misinformation and potentially inciting hate. It's a form of Christian persecution.