It's very likely no one they knew was at the school
The adult victims were 60+ years old. What grounds do you have for speculating that they have not worked at the school for 10 years?
The shooter has a manifesto.
Which you haven't seen yet. Opinions based on uninformed speculations aren't worth much.
you are apologising for the perpetrator and blaming the victim
Nope. I'm pointing out that other motives than the ones you are prematurely accepting are being investigated, and suggesting you wait till the facts come out instead of stating "it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians"
You live in an intellectual fantasy world
Yet you're the one making accusations based on uninformed speculation.
You tried to change the goal post
In the case of Germany you claim that citizens are responsible for the actions of their government, but you won't apply that to yourself, and refuse to discuss the responsibility you claim citizens have for the actions of your government.
Nope. I'm pointing out that other motives than the ones you are prematurely accepting are being investigated, and suggesting you wait till the facts come out instead of stating "it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians"
You obvious think the shooter may have been justified. In my mind it doesn't matter what the motive was. You may be the most disgusting person that exists.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the vandalism and arson attacks targeting Canadian churches "wrong and unacceptable",[25] while later adding that the anger directed towards the church was "fully understandable".[26]
I wonder if "fully understandable" was a signal to his followers that it was okay to burn the churches? Why would he say this?
Does it discount worshipers being terrorised and feeling safe in their house of worship any longer? 71 churches burned and no one cares. One homeless person was arrested and charged in Surrey. Sends a very accepting signal to their base that they won't be procecuted and therefore is effectively procecuting the Christian victims. And since people donate to the church every parisioner was victimized when their interest in the house of worship was destroyed.
Folks, this person thinks I'm persecuting them and Christianity by pointing out that it's odd that someone saying "I am coming" 2,000 years ago still means "I am coming soon" to some people today.
And they are upset that I don't accept their suspicions as facts.
I don't see where anything I've said is being accepted at face value and discussed, so there's not much point in me talking any more.
The adult victims were 60+ years old. What grounds do you have for speculating that they have not worked at the school for 10 years?
Which you haven't seen yet. Opinions based on uninformed speculations aren't worth much.
Nope. I'm pointing out that other motives than the ones you are prematurely accepting are being investigated, and suggesting you wait till the facts come out instead of stating "it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians"
Yet you're the one making accusations based on uninformed speculation.
In the case of Germany you claim that citizens are responsible for the actions of their government, but you won't apply that to yourself, and refuse to discuss the responsibility you claim citizens have for the actions of your government.
You obvious think the shooter may have been justified. In my mind it doesn't matter what the motive was. You may be the most disgusting person that exists.
Because I point out that it's too early claim christian persecution is the motive, it is "obvious" to you that I support the murderer.
I see.
You probably think this isn't Christian prosecution as well.
https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/local/2023/03/29/hopewell-high-school-under-lockdown-police-on-scene-beaver-county/70059868007/
Or this
https://nypost.com/2021/07/12/us-media-shamefully-justified-a-string-of-canadian-church-burnings/
Or this
https://tnc.news/2023/01/16/a-map-of-every-church-burnt-or-vandalized-since-the-residential-school-announcements/
Or this
https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2023/03/30/how-swatting-calls-spread-as-schools-face-real-threats/
Or: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Canadian_church_burnings
I wonder if "fully understandable" was a signal to his followers that it was okay to burn the churches? Why would he say this?
Does it discount worshipers being terrorised and feeling safe in their house of worship any longer? 71 churches burned and no one cares. One homeless person was arrested and charged in Surrey. Sends a very accepting signal to their base that they won't be procecuted and therefore is effectively procecuting the Christian victims. And since people donate to the church every parisioner was victimized when their interest in the house of worship was destroyed.
Folks, this person thinks I'm persecuting them and Christianity by pointing out that it's odd that someone saying "I am coming" 2,000 years ago still means "I am coming soon" to some people today.
And they are upset that I don't accept their suspicions as facts.
I don't see where anything I've said is being accepted at face value and discussed, so there's not much point in me talking any more.
Last word to them.