Leftist science. They’re pathological liars.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Folks this is what the paper is pointing out:
"Interpretation Maps of mortality risks and excess deaths indicate geographical differences, such as a north–south gradient and increased vulnerability in eastern Europe, as well as local variations due to urban characteristics. The modelling framework and results are crucial for the design of national and local health and climate policies and for projecting the effects of cold and heat under future climatic and socioeconomic scenarios." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00023-2/fulltext#seccestitle150
I doubt it occurred to anyone who prepared the study that someone like Patrick Moore or CanadianRighty - who apparently only look at the pictures, and ignore the text - would pounce on one graphic in an 11 page paper, ignore the simple numbers at the bottom - which anyone with a high school education could understand if they tried - and conclude "THey'Re lyinG TO ME!"
Wrong, Tuchodi. This is what the study is pointing out:
And, yes, the chart was misleading. It was obviously done this way on purpose.
Only if you can't tell the difference between the "Findings" section and the "Interpretation" section.
Of course it was done that way on purpose. Graphs are for plotting data. There's no data on the right for 40 - 250.
Apparently you can’t tell the difference because the report is “pointing out” the findings section.
"The modelling framework and results are crucial for the design of national and local health and climate policies and for projecting the effects of cold and heat under future climatic and socioeconomic scenarios."