Leftist science. They’re pathological liars.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Apparently you can’t tell the difference because the report is “pointing out” the findings section.
"The modelling framework and results are crucial for the design of national and local health and climate policies and for projecting the effects of cold and heat under future climatic and socioeconomic scenarios."
Good quote. Doesn’t change the fact that the point of the report is the findings and the posted graph is misleading. There’s no purpose to your bullshit.
Folks, the findings are numbers:
"Findings Across the 854 urban areas in Europe, we estimated an annual excess of 203 620 (empirical 95% CI 180 882–224 613) deaths attributed to cold and 20 173 (17 261–22 934) attributed to heat. These corresponded to age-standardised rates of 129 (empirical 95% CI 114–142) and 13 (11–14) deaths per 100 000 person-years. Results differed across Europe and age groups, with the highest effects in eastern European cities for both cold and heat."
The graphs do not confuse their intended audience, despite what anonymous trolls with no relevant background think.
The graphs do not confuse their intended audience. How much more bullshit can you come up with?