Another tempest in a tea cup folks. It's a shame the Epoch Times choses not to include the email they claim the article is based on, and just cherry-picked a few quotes. That's one of the reasons they're rated as a questionable source.
From the link: "These concerns remain hypothetical and have yet to be proven in scientific research and case studies."
In fact there has been research on this sequence going on for decades:
"There has been no evidence to implicate SV40 virus of vaccine origin in long- or short-term consequences in human subjects." - Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9776239/
The article says it was disclosed: "the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing,"
The epoch Times is quibbling because it wasn't labelled.
As acknowledged in the article and pointed out above "These concerns remain hypothetical and have yet to be proven in scientific research and case studies."
What the article fails to mention is that after decades of research on the question there is still no connection between SV40 and cancer. .I repeat, "After more than 35 years of follow-up, we found no overall excess of deaths from cancer in these individuals who as infants received poliovirus vaccines contaminated with SV40." - British Journal of Cancer - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375249/pdf/85-6692065a.pdf
"While Mr. Buckhaults said on social media he was skeptical about reports of “turbo cancers” stemming from the COVID-19 vaccine, he said there are so many experts concerned with the idea that the scientific establishment “owes it to the public to investigate rigorously and report on it, even if [there are] negative results."
"People have a right to have their concerns taken seriously and addressed by competent caring scientists, even if their concerns end up being invalidated. We should look for monsters under the bed and report results honestly,” he added."
Better to be safe than sorry. If only these examinations could have occurred before it was mass mandated on the public
citation missing
Another tempest in a tea cup folks. It's a shame the Epoch Times choses not to include the email they claim the article is based on, and just cherry-picked a few quotes. That's one of the reasons they're rated as a questionable source.
From the link: "These concerns remain hypothetical and have yet to be proven in scientific research and case studies."
In fact there has been research on this sequence going on for decades:
"Studies Find No Evidence That Simian Virus 40 Is Related To Human Cancer" - National Cancer Institute - https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/08/040825092736.htm
"There has been no evidence to implicate SV40 virus of vaccine origin in long- or short-term consequences in human subjects." - Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9776239/
"After more than 35 years of follow-up, we found no overall excess of deaths from cancer in these individuals who as infants received poliovirus vaccines contaminated with SV40." - British Journal of Cancer - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375249/pdf/85-6692065a.pdf
Why wasnt it disclosed if its harmless?
The article says it was disclosed: "the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing,"
The epoch Times is quibbling because it wasn't labelled.
As acknowledged in the article and pointed out above "These concerns remain hypothetical and have yet to be proven in scientific research and case studies."
What the article fails to mention is that after decades of research on the question there is still no connection between SV40 and cancer. .I repeat, "After more than 35 years of follow-up, we found no overall excess of deaths from cancer in these individuals who as infants received poliovirus vaccines contaminated with SV40." - British Journal of Cancer - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375249/pdf/85-6692065a.pdf
But The Epoch Times wants you to worry about it.
"While Mr. Buckhaults said on social media he was skeptical about reports of “turbo cancers” stemming from the COVID-19 vaccine, he said there are so many experts concerned with the idea that the scientific establishment “owes it to the public to investigate rigorously and report on it, even if [there are] negative results." "People have a right to have their concerns taken seriously and addressed by competent caring scientists, even if their concerns end up being invalidated. We should look for monsters under the bed and report results honestly,” he added."
Better to be safe than sorry. If only these examinations could have occurred before it was mass mandated on the public
What would the virus have been doing in the meantime?