Since she's basing it solely on her lack of any relevant education or experience, and claiming her conclusions are more valid than those of experts, I think "uninformed" is a charitable way to characterize her opinions folks.
It's fact that you have no relevant training or experience, yet you consider your opinions to be more valid than those of the scientists and public health experts who do.
No links to papers or articles by herself or her colleagues in the scientific or academic communities folks, nor any claims to be involved professionally.
Apparently "You can't prove that I'm not an expert" is her argument.
Since she's basing it solely on her lack of any relevant education or experience, and claiming her conclusions are more valid than those of experts, I think "uninformed" is a charitable way to characterize her opinions folks.
More opinions.
You wish.
It's fact that you have no relevant training or experience, yet you consider your opinions to be more valid than those of the scientists and public health experts who do.
Now it's your opinion that I have no relative training or experience. You're killing me with these opinions, man.
No links to papers or articles by herself or her colleagues in the scientific or academic communities folks, nor any claims to be involved professionally.
Apparently "You can't prove that I'm not an expert" is her argument.