This is what he posted:
"Two main statistics have been used to count coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in England: death \registrations involving COVID-19 (reported by the ONS) and deaths within 28 days of a positive SARS-COV-2 test (reported by the UKHSA). The 28-day measure is a timely measure of COVID-19 deaths to inform public health response, but less precise than death registrations which consider the cause of death.
When compared, the 2 measures closely tracked one another (85 to 90% correlation) between May 2020 and December 2021.
85% to 90% correlation would mean covid death stats were over-stated by up to 15%.
I know. But it’s ironic that I’m explaining the facts that he submitted but didn’t understand. He’s in denial now and that’s quite funny.
She seems confused.
She's claiming to acknowledge that the clinical count has been around since 2020 at the same time she's claiming only the eventually less accurate 28 day count was being used until recently.
She can't have it both ways.
Published stats are based on the 28-day count, as per the links that you presented. You’re in denial. Seems like your whole reason for being (scaring everybody about covid) has collapsed. That’s cute.
Well that's embarrassing for her folks. Just 9 days ago she pointed out that the 28 day count was no longer being used.
She appears to have forgotten that.
And two days ago she acknowledged that the clinical test is more accurate and has been in use since 2020.
Yet here she is again, spreading the same old misinformation.
Sad.
What? I guess you don’t understand what i said. You could read it again or, perhaps, ask your mom to explain it.