You have not provided a single instance in 111 years where a child has been removed from the home for lack of vaccination of any kind, let alone a covid vaccine.
You're claiming people should be worried about something that has never happened. It's just your opinion that it might, and you aren't supporting it very well.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308147/
The article said that the parents were deemed negligent for vaccine resistance.
https://www.propublica.org/article/some-constitutional-rights-dont-apply-in-child-welfare
You can have your children removed if deemed negligent.
Nothing about removing children from the family.
Nothing about vaccination.
Your original claim was "It's considered child abuse for example to not want your child injected with lipid nanoparticles." You have expressed the opinion that if "you choose to reject a forced injection through coercion or mandates there is case law that supports the crown case to take your child..
You have not provided a single instance in 111 years where a child has been removed from the home for lack of vaccination of any kind, let alone a covid vaccine.
You're claiming people should be worried about something that has never happened. It's just your opinion that it might, and you aren't supporting it very well.