Your post reads like AI having an inability to reconcile complex thoughts.
Dismissing the NY Post, one of the oldest newspapers in the US is very telling. By not addressing the facts of the story but attacking the messenger you are producing propaganda.
By disconnecting the thread you are dismissing that the argument as a whole leads to a thesis outcome.
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states through taxes to feed the rich of blue states. The rest of the links support the thesis that red states are systematically robbed by blue leaders to punish them. The book on how red states fail their constituents is to show how blue state propaganda is used to blame the victims of federal theft.
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty can lead to additional financial hardship leads to the article that discusses poverty as the primary source of child abuse claims.
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states because poverty is considered a form of neglect.
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning it to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.
Your post reads like AI having an inability to reconcile complex thoughts.
Dismissing the NY Post, one of the oldest newspapers in the US is very telling. By not addressing the facts of the story but attacking the messenger you are producing propaganda.
By disconnecting the thread you are dismissing that the argument as a whole leads to a thesis outcome.
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states through taxes to feed the rich of blue states. The rest of the links support the thesis that red states are systematically robbed by blue leaders to punish them. The book on how red states fail their constituents is to show how blue state propaganda is used to blame the victims of federal theft.
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty can lead to additional financial hardship leads to the article that discusses poverty as the primary source of child abuse claims.
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states because poverty is considered a form of neglect.
https://firstfocus.org/blog/poverty-and-child-neglect-what-we-know-and-what-we-need-to-do
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
You seem unaware of the political realities in the US. The "blue fed gov policies" provide support, and the reds want to remove it: Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority, and "Republicans have repeatedly pushed to cut, privatize, or even end Social Security"
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning it to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.