You'll note, folks, that the discussion is no longer about correlation equaling causation.
A lot of lab work has to be done before a link is made between a circumstance and its cause, and no one in that 4 minute Twitter clip provides that link.
And you are avoiding the point that J. B. Handley is a non-expert who is saying "There must be a connection", but without any evidence other than correlation.
You'll note, folks, that the discussion is no longer about correlation equaling causation.
A lot of lab work has to be done before a link is made between a circumstance and its cause, and no one in that 4 minute Twitter clip provides that link.
You are creating a straw man argument (also known as a tuchidiocy), as if the only indication that they are dangerous were a twitter clip.
And you are avoiding the point that J. B. Handley is a non-expert who is saying "There must be a connection", but without any evidence other than correlation.