An 80 year old crazy skeletal woman, claims without evidence that she was raped when she was 50 yrs old
— Just like CristineBlazeyFraud, Jean Carrol, doesn’t know when she was assaulted and never provided the date. So Trump was prohibited from producing an alibi. The 30 yr old false accusation should be been thrown out due to that fact alone
— Trump was not allowed to deny or defend himself.
— She alleged a rape in a public place 30 years ago when she was 50: and provides no evidence
— Her story was remarkably similar to a plot line of the TV show
— The dress she claimed to be wearing hadn’t even been designed in the decade she claimed
— She’s sex obsessed and continues to talk about how “sexy” rape is
— Her accusation and her TDS lawyers are funded by Democrat Jeff Epstein buddy Reid Hoffman who also backed Nikki Haley
— Her “reputation expert” admitted to having no experience in reputation repair during cross examination. The expert is also found to be a Democrat donor
— The TDS judge instructed jurors in E Jean Carroll trial to never reveal themselves
Perhaps you should be more concerned about how the justice system is being perverted. The woman was allowed to sue in the first place because the NY legislature passed a special exemption extending the limitation period just so they could wage lawfare against him. Not to mention every other politically motivated prosecution.
And objectively speaking, whether he defamed her or not, 83 million is ridiculously high. Especially since this award is larger than the award for the alleged sexual assault.
I personally doubt it happened. Especially when you look at the number of ridiculous coordinated lawsuits that they are piling on him. The efforts to remove him from the ballot are an extension of this. If these things were happening in Russia or Venezuela, we would call it for what it is. Sorry you have drunk the democrat coolaid. Hopefully you will deprogram yourself one day.
You like to cite 2 year old reddit copy pasta links when it was still fashionable to claim that the vaxx did anything. The fact is that it has a less than 50 percent effectiveness, which for any normal vaccine would have resulted in it failing to pass the initial trials, and that is without even considering the obvious rise in myocarditis, neurological disease, sudden death, excess deaths and so on correlating perfectly with the roll out of the vaccine.
I realize that as someone who has vaxxed himself many times over you are invested in this lie, because to admit otherwise would mean facing the horror of what you have done to yourself, which at best is playing russian roulette with an unproven and experimental mrna technology, but there is no need to inflict this bad choice on others. The same people who gleefully condemned this woman to death, are the same type as the vaxx fascists who advocated for the imprisonment and bankrupting of the unvaxxed.
It is a sad indictment of our society that so many people could be convinced that they were the virtuous ones, for taking an experimental vaxx produced by a company with a history of medical fraud and criminal convictions, while at the same time calling for the unvaxxed to be imprisoned, confined to their homes, fired, and made to pay for their own medical care. It is the blue eyes/brown eyes social experiment applied on an industrial scale and you and your ilk fell for it.
"We screened 16 696 records at the title and abstract level, appraised 832 (5·0%) full texts, and initially included 73 (0·4%) studies. Of these, we excluded five (7%) studies because of critical risk of bias, leaving 68 (93%) studies that were extracted for analysis. For infections caused by any SARS-CoV-2 strain, vaccine effectiveness for the primary series reduced from 83% (95% CI 80–86) at baseline (14–42 days) to 62% (53–69) by 112–139 days. Vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 92% (88–94) for hospitalisations and 91% (85–95) for mortality, and reduced to 79% (65–87) at 224–251 days for hospitalisations and 86% (73–93) at 168–195 days for mortality. Estimated vaccine effectiveness was lower for the omicron variant for infections, hospitalisations, and mortality at baseline compared with that of other variants, but subsequent reductions occurred at a similar rate across variants. For booster doses, which covered mostly omicron studies, vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 70% (56–80) against infections and 89% (82–93) against hospitalisations, and reduced to 43% (14–62) against infections and 71% (51–83) against hospitalisations at 112 days or later. Not enough studies were available to report on booster vaccine effectiveness against mortality"
I wanted to reply directly to the misinformation you and those like you continue to spout.
When you develop any one of these: 1) neurological disease 2) autoimmune disease such as MS 3) heart conditions and or 4) cancer I hope you will have a moment of clarity and realize what you have done to yourself, and most of all what you helped inflict on others with your blind faith in a corporation convicted of fraud, and that you will not simply fool yourself into believing that you would have come down with these conditions anyway. And all to combat a disease with a less than one percent lethality.
Now I have replied 3 times. But since you keep replying and worse of all posting this stuff with a compulsive frenzy, you might want to check in on yourself to see if you are fine.
An 80 year old crazy skeletal woman, claims without evidence that she was raped when she was 50 yrs old
— Just like CristineBlazeyFraud, Jean Carrol, doesn’t know when she was assaulted and never provided the date. So Trump was prohibited from producing an alibi. The 30 yr old false accusation should be been thrown out due to that fact alone
— Trump was not allowed to deny or defend himself.
— She alleged a rape in a public place 30 years ago when she was 50: and provides no evidence
— Her story was remarkably similar to a plot line of the TV show
— The dress she claimed to be wearing hadn’t even been designed in the decade she claimed
— She’s sex obsessed and continues to talk about how “sexy” rape is
— Her accusation and her TDS lawyers are funded by Democrat Jeff Epstein buddy Reid Hoffman who also backed Nikki Haley
— Her “reputation expert” admitted to having no experience in reputation repair during cross examination. The expert is also found to be a Democrat donor
— The TDS judge instructed jurors in E Jean Carroll trial to never reveal themselves
Perhaps you should be more concerned about how the justice system is being perverted. The woman was allowed to sue in the first place because the NY legislature passed a special exemption extending the limitation period just so they could wage lawfare against him. Not to mention every other politically motivated prosecution.
And objectively speaking, whether he defamed her or not, 83 million is ridiculously high. Especially since this award is larger than the award for the alleged sexual assault.
65$ mil in punitive damages because he continues to this day to defame her by denying something he has definitely been found liable of doing.
I personally doubt it happened. Especially when you look at the number of ridiculous coordinated lawsuits that they are piling on him. The efforts to remove him from the ballot are an extension of this. If these things were happening in Russia or Venezuela, we would call it for what it is. Sorry you have drunk the democrat coolaid. Hopefully you will deprogram yourself one day.
You like to cite 2 year old reddit copy pasta links when it was still fashionable to claim that the vaxx did anything. The fact is that it has a less than 50 percent effectiveness, which for any normal vaccine would have resulted in it failing to pass the initial trials, and that is without even considering the obvious rise in myocarditis, neurological disease, sudden death, excess deaths and so on correlating perfectly with the roll out of the vaccine.
I realize that as someone who has vaxxed himself many times over you are invested in this lie, because to admit otherwise would mean facing the horror of what you have done to yourself, which at best is playing russian roulette with an unproven and experimental mrna technology, but there is no need to inflict this bad choice on others. The same people who gleefully condemned this woman to death, are the same type as the vaxx fascists who advocated for the imprisonment and bankrupting of the unvaxxed.
It is a sad indictment of our society that so many people could be convinced that they were the virtuous ones, for taking an experimental vaxx produced by a company with a history of medical fraud and criminal convictions, while at the same time calling for the unvaxxed to be imprisoned, confined to their homes, fired, and made to pay for their own medical care. It is the blue eyes/brown eyes social experiment applied on an industrial scale and you and your ilk fell for it.
Folks I will copy paste my Reddit and CDC disinformation below
You replied to the same comment twice - you okay?
"We screened 16 696 records at the title and abstract level, appraised 832 (5·0%) full texts, and initially included 73 (0·4%) studies. Of these, we excluded five (7%) studies because of critical risk of bias, leaving 68 (93%) studies that were extracted for analysis. For infections caused by any SARS-CoV-2 strain, vaccine effectiveness for the primary series reduced from 83% (95% CI 80–86) at baseline (14–42 days) to 62% (53–69) by 112–139 days. Vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 92% (88–94) for hospitalisations and 91% (85–95) for mortality, and reduced to 79% (65–87) at 224–251 days for hospitalisations and 86% (73–93) at 168–195 days for mortality. Estimated vaccine effectiveness was lower for the omicron variant for infections, hospitalisations, and mortality at baseline compared with that of other variants, but subsequent reductions occurred at a similar rate across variants. For booster doses, which covered mostly omicron studies, vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 70% (56–80) against infections and 89% (82–93) against hospitalisations, and reduced to 43% (14–62) against infections and 71% (51–83) against hospitalisations at 112 days or later. Not enough studies were available to report on booster vaccine effectiveness against mortality"
I wanted to reply directly to the misinformation you and those like you continue to spout.
When you develop any one of these: 1) neurological disease 2) autoimmune disease such as MS 3) heart conditions and or 4) cancer I hope you will have a moment of clarity and realize what you have done to yourself, and most of all what you helped inflict on others with your blind faith in a corporation convicted of fraud, and that you will not simply fool yourself into believing that you would have come down with these conditions anyway. And all to combat a disease with a less than one percent lethality.
Now I have replied 3 times. But since you keep replying and worse of all posting this stuff with a compulsive frenzy, you might want to check in on yourself to see if you are fine.
Folks, here’s my science and my evidence that i just googled. Top google searches folks:
Oh look!
The impostor twinsie can make fake links!
Isn't she clever?
Give her lots of upvotes for being so clever folks.
is that the legendary "fake news" ? literal trolled website headlines?
Top google searches folks!
That’s all we brain rotting boomers can do. Google headlines then claim that it’s sCieNcE.
I’m a vaccinated-dumb-fuck folks !
Folks, the impostor twinsie is one of the ones here who can't find any science for their narrative, and has to use bullshit instead.