Are you saying those 2 have no impact to where they should be ignored entirely
the other ones-- had to look them up-- found NCBI talking about 'racism' and 'socioeconomic status'. Perhaps this car mechanic/ health expert/ vaccine scientist/ copy past champion of 2023/ definitely not a sussybaka impostoru can present the others and say how uncontrollable they really are
Urallfucked must be so happy his boss/boyfriend is back. again.
Are you saying those 2 have no impact to where they should be ignored entirely
Cute. This is a classic straw man fallacy folks: "the distortion of someone else’s argument to make it easier to attack"
had to look them up
Sure she did. She can't produce any links though.
Just to re-focus: there are people in this forum who desperately want to consider obesity only as a character flaw / personal failure, and don't like the idea that it might be a disease.
As the article says: "Obesity has now been moved from the healthy eating section of the HSE (Ireland's Health Service Executive) to the chronic disease area."
I do. Whether they can actually lose weight or not due to their own personal determinants, increasing physical activity and decreasing caloric intake improves overall health for everyone.
She can read the article and learn from someone who knows more than her - especially the part about "there are 198 determinants of obesity and they fall in to seven groups – five of which are outside people’s control" - or she can remain willfully ignorant, continuing to claim "fat people that are fat due to life choices, which is the majority of fat people" as those she has done an accredited, peer-reviewed study, or can find one to support her opinion.
I guess that's one of the two groups people can control.
Do you have anything to say about the other six?
My advice on the others is stop being retarded.
Not sure what you mean.
Ignore the other five groups? Pretend that only diet and exercise matter?
Are you saying those 2 have no impact to where they should be ignored entirely
the other ones-- had to look them up-- found NCBI talking about 'racism' and 'socioeconomic status'. Perhaps this car mechanic/ health expert/ vaccine scientist/ copy past champion of 2023/ definitely not a sussybaka impostoru can present the others and say how uncontrollable they really are
Urallfucked must be so happy his boss/boyfriend is back. again.
Cute. This is a classic straw man fallacy folks: "the distortion of someone else’s argument to make it easier to attack"
Sure she did. She can't produce any links though.
Just to re-focus: there are people in this forum who desperately want to consider obesity only as a character flaw / personal failure, and don't like the idea that it might be a disease.
As the article says: "Obesity has now been moved from the healthy eating section of the HSE (Ireland's Health Service Executive) to the chronic disease area."
I do. Whether they can actually lose weight or not due to their own personal determinants, increasing physical activity and decreasing caloric intake improves overall health for everyone.
Yeah, you mentioned that one already.
Anything else?
Yes, fat people that are fat due to life choices, which is the majority of fat people, should be ridiculed.
She can read the article and learn from someone who knows more than her - especially the part about "there are 198 determinants of obesity and they fall in to seven groups – five of which are outside people’s control" - or she can remain willfully ignorant, continuing to claim "fat people that are fat due to life choices, which is the majority of fat people" as those she has done an accredited, peer-reviewed study, or can find one to support her opinion.
It's her choice folks.