The problem with your specious argument is that there is almost no benefit to the covid vaxx while there are known and unknown risks.
Besides, the overall risk of death from covid is less than 1 percent distributed over the entire population. In actual fact the risk is not evenly distributed and is even lower among young healthy people, though of course it is higher among the old or people with comorbidities such as obesity or metabolic diseases such as diabetes.
There was never any reason to make reasonably healthy people take the risk of the vaxx, as you put it, to deal with imperfect medicine. If this had not become a madness of crowds situation, by any objective standard children would not be given the vaxx since they have almost no risk of dying unless they are otherwise sick.
By comparison, I doubt that doctors would even prescribe antibiotics where the patient has less than a one percent chance of death and yet people's lives and careers were destroyed when they made a reasoned risk benefit assessment and decided not to take the vaxx. Imperfect medicine indeed, but not in the sense that you mean it: this fiasco will one day eclipse the thalydomide disaster, and exposed the moral bankruptcy of the medical profession in going along with this.
Just an unsupported opinion from an anonymous person on an obscure social media site folks.
Nothing to see here.
If you wanted to you could find studies from people with relevant training and experience that show that the vaccines reduce the severity and mortality of the virus.
And the people who publish those studies are happy to publish their credentials and sign their work, unlike Kinder12. Some of them might be happy to debate people like Kinder12, if she would contact them.
But she doesn't want to talk to them. She'd rather just spout off here.
The problem with your specious argument is that there is almost no benefit to the covid vaxx while there are known and unknown risks.
Besides, the overall risk of death from covid is less than 1 percent distributed over the entire population. In actual fact the risk is not evenly distributed and is even lower among young healthy people, though of course it is higher among the old or people with comorbidities such as obesity or metabolic diseases such as diabetes.
There was never any reason to make reasonably healthy people take the risk of the vaxx, as you put it, to deal with imperfect medicine. If this had not become a madness of crowds situation, by any objective standard children would not be given the vaxx since they have almost no risk of dying unless they are otherwise sick.
By comparison, I doubt that doctors would even prescribe antibiotics where the patient has less than a one percent chance of death and yet people's lives and careers were destroyed when they made a reasoned risk benefit assessment and decided not to take the vaxx. Imperfect medicine indeed, but not in the sense that you mean it: this fiasco will one day eclipse the thalydomide disaster, and exposed the moral bankruptcy of the medical profession in going along with this.
Yawn.
Just an unsupported opinion from an anonymous person on an obscure social media site folks.
Nothing to see here.
If you wanted to you could find studies from people with relevant training and experience that show that the vaccines reduce the severity and mortality of the virus.
And the people who publish those studies are happy to publish their credentials and sign their work, unlike Kinder12. Some of them might be happy to debate people like Kinder12, if she would contact them.
But she doesn't want to talk to them. She'd rather just spout off here.
When you start with "yawn" you are projecting. You really are a boring pedant who is always confidently wrong. A Tuchidiot, in fact.
And you're still an anonymous social media poster with no proof to back up their unsupported opinions.
Its okay, pedant. You are an overweight tuchidiot prolifically copying and pasting links you harvested from Reddit. Quite a life you have there.