Folks, by now she's been told repeatedly that studies showed that the covid vaccines reduced the severity of infections and the mortality rate.
Here's another one to that effect: "The findings of this study support the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in reducing mortality among infected individuals. Unvaccinated patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to vaccinated patients. Vaccination remains a crucial strategy to mitigate the severity of the disease and reduce mortality rates."https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492612/"
In other words: Grandma was safer if everyone that could be was vaccinated.
Why is Kinder12 ignoring that and focusing on the fact that it didn't prevent people from getting infected?
Why is Kinder12 ignoring that and focusing on the fact that it didn't prevent people from getting infected?
You really are pathetic. Fauci and his ilk are the same folks who told you explicitly that if you got vaccinated you would not get covid. And yet the vaccine does not work as advertised. So forcing everyone to get vaccinated clearly would not protect grandma from getting it.
Firstly there would still be carriers of covid to infect her and secondly she could still be infected herself.
Even if vaccinating grandma would offer her some reduction in severity of infection, then the solution was to vaccinate grandma and other vulnerable people only, not everyone including children who had almost no risk of death.
The fact that you cannot see the obvious or carry out even the most basic critical thinking, yet likely can vote, is a scary thought.
told you explicitly that if you got vaccinated you would not get covid
A common lie folks. One that is never acknowledged by the anti-vaxxers. Science said the vaccines offered 95% protection - see below - and officials said the vaccines would protect people.
The simple-minded, the misinformed, and the malicious chose to interpret that as "I'll never get the virus".
Some of them still choose/claim to hear that all these years later.
And that was before the arrival of the variants of concern, against which the vaccines had not been tested, and which turned out to be more dangerous.
forcing everyone to get vaccinated clearly would not protect grandma
See folks? She's willfully or mistakenly choosing to interpret "protect" as "100% she will never get it" instead of "severity and mortality will be reduced".
Perhaps 95% protection is too subtle a concept for her to grasp.
Back to "folks". I was optimistic about you my little NPC. The programming is strong in this creature.
Officials categorically stated that if you got vaccinated you could not get infected or pass it on. Then cases amid the vaccinated came out and they were just "break through" cases. You are having to retcon what they said in order to deal with the fact that they lied and this does not work, apart from any health risks.
Folks, by now she's been told repeatedly that studies showed that the covid vaccines reduced the severity of infections and the mortality rate.
Here's another one to that effect: "The findings of this study support the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in reducing mortality among infected individuals. Unvaccinated patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to vaccinated patients. Vaccination remains a crucial strategy to mitigate the severity of the disease and reduce mortality rates."https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492612/"
In other words: Grandma was safer if everyone that could be was vaccinated.
Why is Kinder12 ignoring that and focusing on the fact that it didn't prevent people from getting infected?
You really are pathetic. Fauci and his ilk are the same folks who told you explicitly that if you got vaccinated you would not get covid. And yet the vaccine does not work as advertised. So forcing everyone to get vaccinated clearly would not protect grandma from getting it.
Firstly there would still be carriers of covid to infect her and secondly she could still be infected herself.
Even if vaccinating grandma would offer her some reduction in severity of infection, then the solution was to vaccinate grandma and other vulnerable people only, not everyone including children who had almost no risk of death.
The fact that you cannot see the obvious or carry out even the most basic critical thinking, yet likely can vote, is a scary thought.
Imagine quoting Pfizer Pharmaceuticals to prove that your Pfizer propaganda is true.
Fucking embarrassing. Peak Tuchidiocy
Imagine having to make stuff up in order to comment.
A common lie folks. One that is never acknowledged by the anti-vaxxers. Science said the vaccines offered 95% protection - see below - and officials said the vaccines would protect people.
The simple-minded, the misinformed, and the malicious chose to interpret that as "I'll never get the virus".
Some of them still choose/claim to hear that all these years later.
And that was before the arrival of the variants of concern, against which the vaccines had not been tested, and which turned out to be more dangerous.
See folks? She's willfully or mistakenly choosing to interpret "protect" as "100% she will never get it" instead of "severity and mortality will be reduced".
Perhaps 95% protection is too subtle a concept for her to grasp.
The Lancet, February 17, 2021 : "a 95% vaccine efficacy"
Yale Medicine, November 5, 2021: "it was 94% effective"
University of Oxford, 2021 Jun; 21: "The mRNA-based Pfizer1, 2 and Moderna3 vaccines were shown to have 94â95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19"
Back to "folks". I was optimistic about you my little NPC. The programming is strong in this creature.
Officials categorically stated that if you got vaccinated you could not get infected or pass it on. Then cases amid the vaccinated came out and they were just "break through" cases. You are having to retcon what they said in order to deal with the fact that they lied and this does not work, apart from any health risks.
Huh. Also a month late. Weird.
Notice how cleverly she skips over supplying any support for this opinion folks?
I guess it's too hard for her to come up with a medical professional saying something like that.
Or maybe she interprets "the vaccine will protect you" as "you won't get sick from the virus".
That would be too bad, because it would mean she's interpreting 95% as 100%.
Or maybe she's applying things that were said about the original version of the virus to later variants like Delta, Omicron, and so forth.
That would be too bad too.
Whatever. She's obviously confused.