So just because it cant be eradicated completly, you dont want to diminish its ability to spread and mutate? I mean I guess that make sense if you've got evidence that'll itll mutate into something less harmful and give us an immunity from the deadlier strains. I'm not forcing anything on anyone, just kinda makes you look scared of wearing a mask. Which kinda looks even weaker than being scared of covid.
Do we do this for the flu or a common-cold? Why should we change our entire society around for covid-19? The costs aren't worth the benefits. The death rate is ~0.4% with the vast majority of people dying being over 70yos with pre-existing conditions. This is not a virus we change anything for.
I get what your saying, I'm just being real about still being ruled by retard government. The fact we got to this point in the first place is the real issue. Arguing about weather or not to wear a mask on your face because you think its harmful to your health is not honest. No ones gonna believe you that wearing a mask is damaging to your lungs, it hurts your argument.
This letter would have been better off with the stats you provided instead of the bogus "I cant breathe (good)" in a mask
Oh, I agree. Those against masks are right IMO but this is an issue of how best to govern a society. The government has no business restricting the liberties of society and legislating on a virus of this magnitude. If this was the black death or something then sure but covid-19 is not a pandemic the government should be legislating over. Sweden's death rate is already near 0 now and their economy actually was positive in the first quarter this year while most european countries were down.
The way our governments have been handling covid-19 is all wrong. The mask argument shouldn't be about whether it stops covid-19 or not or oxygen or whatever. it's about the fact that the government has been handling this pandemic all wrong from the start and more government legislation is not the solution. Let people decide for themselves what works best for them. There is no crisis to our society over this pandemic that needs to force the governments hand. Legislators just need to sit down and do absolutely nothing.
Were mostly in agreement, I'm against mandatory masks. But not masks in general, which is probably what you meant anyways as you seem pro-freedom/liberty which is really what we need more of. I'm just saying without reliable data it's more moral/safer to wear the mask without being forced to. Might even be able to sway some leftys to the right by showing concern independent of the states orders.
Depending on what you do for work you should be able to flat out say no, but I got a few people with underlying health issues in the office I work with, so I wear the mask just in case when I'm within 6 ft.
So just because it cant be eradicated completly, you dont want to diminish its ability to spread and mutate? I mean I guess that make sense if you've got evidence that'll itll mutate into something less harmful and give us an immunity from the deadlier strains. I'm not forcing anything on anyone, just kinda makes you look scared of wearing a mask. Which kinda looks even weaker than being scared of covid.
Do we do this for the flu or a common-cold? Why should we change our entire society around for covid-19? The costs aren't worth the benefits. The death rate is ~0.4% with the vast majority of people dying being over 70yos with pre-existing conditions. This is not a virus we change anything for.
I get what your saying, I'm just being real about still being ruled by retard government. The fact we got to this point in the first place is the real issue. Arguing about weather or not to wear a mask on your face because you think its harmful to your health is not honest. No ones gonna believe you that wearing a mask is damaging to your lungs, it hurts your argument.
This letter would have been better off with the stats you provided instead of the bogus "I cant breathe (good)" in a mask
Oh, I agree. Those against masks are right IMO but this is an issue of how best to govern a society. The government has no business restricting the liberties of society and legislating on a virus of this magnitude. If this was the black death or something then sure but covid-19 is not a pandemic the government should be legislating over. Sweden's death rate is already near 0 now and their economy actually was positive in the first quarter this year while most european countries were down.
The way our governments have been handling covid-19 is all wrong. The mask argument shouldn't be about whether it stops covid-19 or not or oxygen or whatever. it's about the fact that the government has been handling this pandemic all wrong from the start and more government legislation is not the solution. Let people decide for themselves what works best for them. There is no crisis to our society over this pandemic that needs to force the governments hand. Legislators just need to sit down and do absolutely nothing.
Were mostly in agreement, I'm against mandatory masks. But not masks in general, which is probably what you meant anyways as you seem pro-freedom/liberty which is really what we need more of. I'm just saying without reliable data it's more moral/safer to wear the mask without being forced to. Might even be able to sway some leftys to the right by showing concern independent of the states orders.
Depending on what you do for work you should be able to flat out say no, but I got a few people with underlying health issues in the office I work with, so I wear the mask just in case when I'm within 6 ft.