Canada’s fertility rate hits all-time low
(tnc.news)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
That's what you get when the government tells singles and people who don't live with their SO to not make close contact with people they don't live with because of COVID. Ontario got rid of the social circle/bubble concept yesterday.
Yeah let's make young people put their life on hold just so terrified boomers can watch TV and garden for a few more years.
Save on the nanny, put it in the fanny
Womans liberation is working as intended.
it sure is
Gee, I wonder if there is some kind of connection between third wave feminism and western birth rates, divorce rates, affirmative action, abortion laws and how WWII ended.
It's almost as if a small group of people culturally subverted an entire country by infiltrating their institutions and implementing damaging laws and changes to the fabric of the society with the ultimate goal to be complete erasure of the middle class and their assets.
Family law act, why risk it ?
Some fun math and da sciences for the kids.
In 1990, population of Canada was approximately 27 million.
In 2020, population of Canada is approximately 37 million.
Net Growth in 30 years = 10 million
During this time, we are looking at 1.80 in 1990 to 1.50 (1.4988% in 2018 acc. World Bank) fertility rate over time. About 2.20 is population replacement and required to maintain the present population with 0 net growth. We grew 10 million or approximately 30% with a NEGATIVE NATIVE GROWTH RATE. Also note - this includes immigrant birthrates, whcih are SIGNIFICANTLY higher than native Euro-Canadian birthrates. The real Canadian birthrate is roughly 1.30-1.40 range.
According to our supreme leader, we are only getting about 200,000 immigrants per year. 30 x 200,000 = 6 million. Yet we grew 10 million. Even at 30 years x 300,000 immigrants, thats ONLY 9 million. Yet we grew 10 million. With a birth rate below replacement. This means you need FAR more than just a flat 10 million to grow 10 million since a) people are dying with a boomer population and b) the native population is shrinking over this time period by a significant number. It also would assume some immigrants die or move to America or return home or other factors that would not be a static unchanging number.
In 1996, the non-visible minority (aka white) population was 88.8% or about 25 million out of 28 million total population. Our Euro-Canadian population has shrunk with a below replacement birthrate and almost exclusively 3rd world immigration strategy over 30 years. Let's assume the Euro-Canadian population stayed static at 25 million for 30 years. 25 million / 37 million = 67% for our demographics assuming the population remained static. We have a BELOW REPLACEMENT BIRTHRATE. This is statistically impossible to maintain 25 million with even the 1.5 birthrate of the total population, let alone our 1.3 or lower Euro-Canadian birthrate over 30 years AND a boomer population dying off in droves.
As such, the true Canadian population is close to 20 million, possibly lower. The entire growth over 30 years is from foreign replacement in GTA, Montreal and Hong Couver, along with any othe rmajor city. The general population is only just starting to see the invasion spread to smaller towns and cities and "noticing things" (aka being racist). Demographics are everything and Canada lost the war decades ago.
Really activates the almonds huh : western birthrates at an all time low, below replacement levels yet mass importing 3rd world women who have 4-6 children is at an all time high.
It's almost as if this was the plan all along and we are in the 'action' stage now.
In quebec, french citizens are paid to have more children. Really makes you think.
Exactly.
Want to buy a home in the GTA to start a family in? Well you are going to be bidding against multi-generation families who pool their 6 incomes together to pay the mortgage or slumlords who are going to convert the home into an illegal rooming house.