Lol... i hear ya. I just nicely say I can’t wear a mask. I don’t want to trigger a SJW into a public spectacle. They won’t trigger if you don’t escalate it. Just play nice and don’t give them ANYTHING to feed off. No looks, no remarks or eye rolls. They are ready for a fight. Take the wind out if their sails and be nice and say your exempt. Most people are just doing their job so I don’t get mad because they are doing what they are told. We need to direct our energy at the politicians and NOT each other. I thought the print out might confuse them. Just more ammo to try on them
Eh, I've seen people try it with such cards and they only ended up either being denied entry or be threatened with the police. And this was in "Conservative" Saskatchewan.
The cops shouldn’t be on the side of the business they’re either breaking the law or being discriminatory against you for not wearing a mask. Either way they lose. If the cops do take it out on you lawyer up and sue the shit out of them because they are breaking their own written laws if they side against you.
She's calling it infections in the article when it is "cases" - ie not even confirmed or guaranteed in any way. They have 658 cases out of 40,900 tests. Not deaths. Not hospitalizaitons. Not in ICU. Not bedridden or showing symptoms or dying or on ventilators or remotely sick. Just potential positive antibodies found in fucked up testing system where the number of cycles dictate how many false positives you get. Even 5 less cycles from 40 to 35 results in 90% reduction in "cases". 10 less is over 97% less "cases". These people are insane. They all should hang on parliment hill for their traitorous and evil ways.
Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks still comes back positive if the cycle count is too high, meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious and thus not real cases. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.
The test doesn't look for a meaning. It only tells you if you have the virus or not. It doesn't say anything about the person being infectious or symptomatic.
Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate
This is not true. The inventor of the test said that it wasn't suited to identifying a virus, because the test doesn't look for the virus. But the inventor said that the test is suited for looking for of gene sequences of a virus. And this is what the test does. It looks for two specific gene sequences of the Coronavirus and you need to have both in you swab to get tested positive.
USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives
Sounds like a Facebook meme. Would like to have more infos about that.
In the source you linked it says nowhere htat the "cycle count skews the results".
And yeah I know it sounds like a meme but it’s right here
But that's not what you said. You said that 90% of PCR test results are false positives. The NY Times article says that "up to 90% of people testing barely carried any virus". Even if you barely carry any virus, you still have the virus. This is not a false positive. You may not be infectious, but you're infected. And there are more than one reason why a person could have a low virus load. Maybe the person is already over the infection. Maybe the person has a good immune system. Or maybe the person just got infected and if the test would have been taken two days later, the virus load could be in the infectious range.
If they are asymptomatic and non infectious that’s not a case, that’s a false positive. You don’t count as a case of influenza if you got tested with a PCR test and it found some part of that virus in your body right now, so why does covid?
This is not the definition of false positive. The definition of false positive is that you test positive as infected while you're not infected. Asymptotic and not infectious people are still infected and thus positive. You can't just change the definition because it fits your narrative.
You don’t count as a case of influenza if you got tested with a PCR test and it found some part of that virus in your body right now, so why does covid?
Because the PCR test searches for two gene sequences of the Coronavirus. If these two gene sequences are traceable in your swab, then there is a 98% chance that you're infected. PCR tests for influenza work the same way. Years ago, I did a PCR test for H1N1. And like any other PCR test it searched for traces of specific gene sequences. In this case it was H1N1 gene sequences.
Detection of anti-bodies doesn't mean that it's over for you and the passed your Covid infection. You could still be in the battling phase and fighting actively the virus.
Then they will say “See, the mask mandate worked! We should all wear mask from now on as a precautionary measure.”
Such propaganda. Here is a print out for Mask Exemption.
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/therebel/pages/47793/attachments/original/1596223469/generic_card_print.pdf?1596223469
As if this shit works.
Lol... i hear ya. I just nicely say I can’t wear a mask. I don’t want to trigger a SJW into a public spectacle. They won’t trigger if you don’t escalate it. Just play nice and don’t give them ANYTHING to feed off. No looks, no remarks or eye rolls. They are ready for a fight. Take the wind out if their sails and be nice and say your exempt. Most people are just doing their job so I don’t get mad because they are doing what they are told. We need to direct our energy at the politicians and NOT each other. I thought the print out might confuse them. Just more ammo to try on them
Eh, I've seen people try it with such cards and they only ended up either being denied entry or be threatened with the police. And this was in "Conservative" Saskatchewan.
Wow, that will show them when the cops will be on their side.
The cops shouldn’t be on the side of the business they’re either breaking the law or being discriminatory against you for not wearing a mask. Either way they lose. If the cops do take it out on you lawyer up and sue the shit out of them because they are breaking their own written laws if they side against you.
Yeah, we saw how that played out multiple times already. And not one time the police sided with the "I don't want to wear a mask" person.
She's calling it infections in the article when it is "cases" - ie not even confirmed or guaranteed in any way. They have 658 cases out of 40,900 tests. Not deaths. Not hospitalizaitons. Not in ICU. Not bedridden or showing symptoms or dying or on ventilators or remotely sick. Just potential positive antibodies found in fucked up testing system where the number of cycles dictate how many false positives you get. Even 5 less cycles from 40 to 35 results in 90% reduction in "cases". 10 less is over 97% less "cases". These people are insane. They all should hang on parliment hill for their traitorous and evil ways.
As far as I know Ontario uses PCR tests and these don't look for antibodies. PCR tests look for genetic sequences of the China flu in your swab.
Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks still comes back positive if the cycle count is too high, meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious and thus not real cases. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.
The test doesn't look for a meaning. It only tells you if you have the virus or not. It doesn't say anything about the person being infectious or symptomatic.
This is not true. The inventor of the test said that it wasn't suited to identifying a virus, because the test doesn't look for the virus. But the inventor said that the test is suited for looking for of gene sequences of a virus. And this is what the test does. It looks for two specific gene sequences of the Coronavirus and you need to have both in you swab to get tested positive.
Sounds like a Facebook meme. Would like to have more infos about that.
Ahh thanks for pointing out the typo/ edit failure there lol. I retyped that bit hopefully it makes a bit more sense.
Fair enough, my point being is that the cycle count is what skews the results. There are sources that agree with this https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
And yeah I know it sounds like a meme but it’s right here https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
“up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
In the source you linked it says nowhere htat the "cycle count skews the results".
But that's not what you said. You said that 90% of PCR test results are false positives. The NY Times article says that "up to 90% of people testing barely carried any virus". Even if you barely carry any virus, you still have the virus. This is not a false positive. You may not be infectious, but you're infected. And there are more than one reason why a person could have a low virus load. Maybe the person is already over the infection. Maybe the person has a good immune system. Or maybe the person just got infected and if the test would have been taken two days later, the virus load could be in the infectious range.
If they are asymptomatic and non infectious that’s not a case, that’s a false positive. You don’t count as a case of influenza if you got tested with a PCR test and it found some part of that virus in your body right now, so why does covid?
This is not the definition of false positive. The definition of false positive is that you test positive as infected while you're not infected. Asymptotic and not infectious people are still infected and thus positive. You can't just change the definition because it fits your narrative.
Because the PCR test searches for two gene sequences of the Coronavirus. If these two gene sequences are traceable in your swab, then there is a 98% chance that you're infected. PCR tests for influenza work the same way. Years ago, I did a PCR test for H1N1. And like any other PCR test it searched for traces of specific gene sequences. In this case it was H1N1 gene sequences.
New definition of cases in Ontario. The cases spike as soon as they changed the definition. They are running the biggest scam in history and laughing at you.
Detection of anti-bodies doesn't mean that it's over for you and the passed your Covid infection. You could still be in the battling phase and fighting actively the virus.
This just confirms that all restaurants should be closed for good. Also, doing push-ups and pull-ups, bad.