Yes exactly audiences just see two arguments and value each equally which is why a liberal won't argue on merits but use what-abouts or shoot the messenger (ad hominim) to try to devalue a reference or your point of view.
Best to just say their arguments are dumb and any child can see it if they only had half a brain
Hamsamwich hasn't been here for a year. Seems the coincidence may have got him.
The other two are on reduced hours. Seems they are being reassigned or just lost their willpower because if you don't have faith everything is a challenge to maintain.
Besides it's not worth the effort to debate them they are liberals and incapable of debate. Your best form of discourse is ridicule.
You can be Canadian and have a view of the party in power. Look at how radical Peter C Neumann and Trudeau Sr were to the Diefenbaker government.
They wrote many very contentious things about that government through Cite Libre and the Neumann articles. In Canada you aren't ruled by a party in power because the party is not the ruler of the land like a tyrant but serve the public sentiment. They need consensus amongst the parliament and Senate to form a series of laws to manage. If polls show the party has consensus of the people I would say it's a measure of the public support to lead in such a way.
The sentiment is key. Last I saw the liberals have lost the public will and are in a challenging position where any unconstitutional activities may lead to a new government deciding to take constitutional action and boomerang.
The radical discussion is more just a function of a method of words. Liberals want to paint their political enemies as radicals rather than compete in the politician sphere where they are losing the will of the people to govern.
Refering to their failures is not radical. Jailing and debanking your political enemies is if the actions are unconstitutional as was the case I noted.
https://www.cbc.ca/history/EPISCONTENTSE1EP16CH1PA4LE.html
Liberals were always and forever the radicals. Always quick to overrule sovereign rights.
CPC want to turn back the clock of overreach by the liberals and turn the government back into a representative rather than authoritative tyrannical socialist nanny state.
Only one party used excessive force in subjugation of Canadians and that is the liberals.
If the majority rule for a party, they have a mandate. A minority government propped up by a coalition is so rare in Canada.
Both cases for the emergency act are considered unconstitutional and is the definition of "radical".
The government had to rewrite the war measures act because of the way Trudeau Sr abused his power by a backdoor invocation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539940/
The term "long COVID" seems to have been crowd sourced.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/covid-19-internment-camps-disinformation-1.5769592
They never talked about internment.
How much you want to bet he or someone he loves was molested by a priest?
https://www.edweek.org/leadership/sexual-abuse-by-educators-is-scrutinized/2004/03
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/forgotten-study-abuse-in-school-100-times-worse-than-by-priests/
More likely a teacher, so what is your next excuse for burning churches? Could there be some connection to the story of the residential schools inflaming the population against the church?
Probably so.
Well it's actually AIDs.
AIDs is an auto inflammatory condition.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoinflammatory_diseases
The other terms like "VAIDS" sometimes feel like they are created by fact checkers/bad actors as ear worms to use to discredit anyone who presents alternative research.
We are dealing with the 80-20 rule. Communism is very attractive to people with no skills and only survive off the efforts of others.
Sadly that is 80% of the Canadian voting population. The others are busy working to feed the freeloaders.
Most serious is the protein generation.
When the ribosome is confronted with a string of these modified bases called N1-methylpseudouridine in the mRNA, it slips around 10% of the time causing the mRNA to be misread and unintended proteins to be produced – enough to trigger an immune response>
The finding that unintended proteins may be produced as a result of vaccination is sufficient cause for regulators to conduct full risk assessments of past or future harms that may have ensued. We note that regulators have previously failed to insist on the study and assessment of risk of the pharmacology and toxicology of novel spike protein heterotrimers forming after injection of the bivalent COVID-19 modRNA vaccines.
That can cause many serious issues like cancers which you wouldn't like to share.
When you complain about or "shoot the messenger" isn't that an "ad hominim" attack? A form of misinformation?
I think Bill C-11 is criticised for addressing it in that term. https://catalyst.independent.org/2023/01/06/dark-side-of-bill-c-11-canadian-voices/
I remember reading about that guy who wrote the book that became the musical and film "Cabaret" (which about the1930s weimar period) used to travel to Germany from the UK for cheap starving male children to "engage" with in the later 1920s and early 30's (book is set in the time from just after hyperinflation in 1925 and 1931).
The hyperinflation of the 1920s lead to much hardship in Germany which inevitably led to the sins of Weimar:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
The left celebrated it because the writer took his roommate for an abortion to show how unfair illegal abortion was. The people in the film were "adultified" generally since much prostitution took advantage of the poor children as it often does.
he had moved to Berlin in order to avail himself of boy prostitutes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodbye_to_Berlin
Looks like history is bouncing around again.
You got any links for those or are you just making it up.
Why would an eco terrorist be "alt right". It makes about as much sense as sending out eco terrorist to burn a forest down and having them claim to be alt right to false flag it. They try to discredit the people trying to stop them.
In reality the simplest answer is the right one. Leftists are the mentally deranged psychopaths that burn down forests in the name of saving them by proving their climate change fantasies are real. The climate change leftists are well known to do that in the states and Washington and California lost billions in homes and countless lives catering to their insanity.
It's always leftists:
How do they get their marching orders?
The RCMP are still after other eco terrorist folks that started all the other fires as the article states. The uncomfortable reality is that the leads are possibly pointing to people they don't want to expose so they are slow rolling them otherwise why not drag in everyone who was in the area and start asking questions?
At some point the strings that connect them will be found and I really doubt they will end up being "alt right". Not too many climate change NGOs are run by "alt right" eco terrorists and funded by gov handouts.
https://nitter.net/rupasubramanya/status/1748002358234132882?s=20
Looks like another charged in NS as well as this Quebec charged.
Climate change activists for the win.
I wonder why he would light fires then "blame government" for those fires? What end game was it?
Although the article states 99% of fires were lightning, they don't reference a source except an opinion by the spokesperson.
The truth is:
True but the acolytes are generally leftists. The novice usually is pretty normal so yes you're right.
But the closer a liberal gets to the mysteries of their faith, the more leftist they become.