https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6210064/
Interesting that it serves as a repair mechanism for nerve damage. Ive never seen anything else have such a grand benefit for mankind.
Why "Cell-free protein synthesis" would not be a proper test is that the concern with truncated mRNA is the runaway generation on protein rather than showing a single instance with "background noise".
The "background noise" can exponentially replicate in the real world which is what the NIH document raises as a concern. This can become a dangerous artifact.
Seems that saying truncated mRNA was found to be inconsequential in "cell-free in vitro expression system" tests is not reflected in real world trials. Did they go beyond cell free testing?
Cell-free protein synthesis, also known as in vitro protein synthesis or CFPS, is the production of protein using biological machinery in a cell-free system, that is, without the use of living cells. The in vitro protein synthesis environment is not constrained by a cell wall or homeostasis conditions necessary to maintain cell viability. Thus, CFPS enables direct access and control of the translation environment which is advantageous for a number of applications including co-translational solubilisation of membrane proteins, optimisation of protein production, incorporation of non-natural amino acids, selective and site-specific labelling. Due to the open nature of the system, different expression conditions such as pH, redox potentials, temperatures, and chaperones can be screened. Since there is no need to maintain cell viability, toxic proteins can be produced.
This testing seems to be mechanical and may be used to incorrectly create a pro result statement.
Truncated mRNA is admittedly very dangerous per NIH.
I'm not sure where the reference to protection appears in the article as it was referring to injuries possibly sustained by uninvestigated issues observed by a government body which:
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains truncated mRNA, which the EMA flagged as a reason for its “major objection,” indicating a preclusion of their approval.
Pfizer has not investigated the detrimental outcomes of truncated mRNA in its vaccines.
Pfizer submitted Western blot figures to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EMA that were digitally generated—not from actual experiments.
There has been an alarming lack of action taken by health authorities on this issue.
Truncated mRNA potentially contributes to multiple vaccine-related injuries, including misfolded spike protein-induced fibrous blood clots, autoimmune disorders, and cancer.
These problems with the Pfizer vaccine could have resulted in drastic product quality variations from batch to batch. This could explain the difference in adverse events experienced by vaccine recipients.
The root cause of such irresponsible conduct by pharma and health authorities is a lack of ethics. ...
Sounds like they weren't referring to your studies. They were more concerned in the article about the risks associated with truncated mRNA sequences which could have an adverse effect and have not been studied.
We should stop referring to people as "vaccinated" rather "injected".
They still use the 14 day period to hide injection deaths as unvaccinated to destabilise the numbers. The true death rate would be exponentially higher if the results of the shot were reported factually.
The rollout of the injections in dec 2020-mar 2021 coincided with the spike in myocarditis awareness, a full year after COVID supposedly cause heart problems.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=CA&q=Myocarditis
For those that argue that the results for everyone are different here's a reason why the whole plan was so evil.
There used to be a mixing video put out by the university of Toronto explaining how the properly mix the vials for distribution.
You create up to six vials manually from a single vial of mRNA. The user uses a syringe to suck out the mRNA and inject it into saline.
From there they manually shake the vial 5-10 times (depends on video).
That always sounded very unprofessional and would lead to natural discrepancies in vial consistency which would benefit the mRNA by causing randomization to help cover up the end result.
This is why there are multiple shots and boosters. Inevitably you end up with a strong dose and get a bad effect.
I would never trust a product that relies on a quickly trained worker to get right. Most of the mRNA were hastily trained new hires to meet demand. That's like trusting a guy from a factory with surgery. I'm sure he's skilled but in the end not for that job.
Here's a video that explains it. They hide the process now so the public don't see by saying "dilution material" at the part where they say "take 1.3ml of undiluted mrna and dilute it". The dilution material is saline and a single vial of mRNA creates 5-6 vials of mRNA administrative product https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MSjtau7I9HA
Yes a nurse friend of mine with myocarditis told me she is depressed by how many birth defects she is seeing.
She had to get the jab for work and woke up after the grape vine in the hospital told her the heart condition was in all rights from the jab.
Sad way to wake up.
Admittedly the COVID "vaccines" are listed as gene therapies. The definition of "vaccines" was changed to accomodate this introduction.
Now take a drive into gene therapy cancer and stroke accociations. It's been 30 years of jabbing and nudging to the precipice.
Public Health worldwide has been constructed as a cult. It's going to be a rough road for those adherents.
They will need to know they are in a cult without being able to see out from the inner school:
https://twitter.censors.us/ConceptualJames/status/1622269196196347906
Any pension that sent funds out of country is a national security risk.