3
BritPedeMEGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah the gov.

Stats brought to you by the same people who said income taxes were temporary, tea tax is good for you and saddam has WMD.

3
BritPedeMEGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Welllll....if the function of the jabby is to:

  1. Sneak billions of nanolipid spheres into nucleus of the cells using a PEG nanolipid capsule containing a 'software' instruction.

  2. That a (random) body cell (of theoretically any type with manufacturing ability) then blissfully cranks out toxic spike proteins expressed and built on the outside of that cell,

  3. That the bodies defence cells then see and go WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT, and attack it, and or chemically signal the body sell to self destruct (atoposis),

  4. And nobody knows how long for, how many, where, when the body does this for,

  5. and nobody knows how long the body takes to clear these toxic spike proteins for, or clear the nanolipids,

  6. and that some of these cells happen to be in the endometrium (womb lining) of a womans body.....

Then NO SHIT it screws up periods.

Sounds like a great idea ....NOT.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone else not give a crap about the cases? That tells us nothing.

OK so X amount of people have tested "positive" for the corona over this day/month/time period.

So what? You get "cases" of having veruccas every year. Or Chicken pox.

How many does X kill per 100 people?

And the question nobody seems to be able to answer is, why the phuq are we bothering with a prophylactic jab to head off a bug that has an over 99.5% survival rate?!!?!?

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is almost as dangerous these days as saying "I have information that may lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton"

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone else recall only, what was it...back in april 2021 Pfizer shot was 95% effective, and then the Russians boasted theirs was 98%, and the entire jab industry went into some wild willy waving contest. JNJ with their "one and done".

I could find some clips on video of the dinosaur media crowing about it, but I posit we can all vividly remember how cock a hoop they were. Now what is it, 4th shot (5th I heard somewhere) of the exact same liquid as the first one?

Then there was that English gov lab rep fella (bald fat dude) who was on the BBC sitting by his lab desk saying that each shot reduces your native immunity a bit more and that you will need additional injections to compensate.

Wonderful.

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for the media articles.

It appears the writers may have short memories. In Canada much, if not most of the business difficulties were caused by government, not a pathogen.

Mr. Trudeau elected to put thousands on the CERB dole, with many of them finding that the CERB paid better than being in employment, so effectively paying people with printed money to sit on their posteriors, despite 'hiring' signs popping up everywhere.

Biden and his trillions of printed money handed out as covid 'relief' also helped people sitting on their bums instead of going back to work. Legions of teachers in the USA and Canada are milking this to the max, and still being paid (by us!) instead of getting their lazy asses back to work.

Nurses and docs and assorted staff being fired or 'encouraged' to quit or take the jabby.

Same with truckers in Canada and the USA. The mainstream had articles on truckers being told jabby or go. Plain as day, our Canadian goods entering the states via truck, driver doesnt have or want the jabby? 1 less trucker. Id imagine its the same the other way.

Trudeau said all who enter from the USA must be jabbied. So that includes truckers carrying vegetables from California and US originating goods. No truckers? No goods, no supply, no goods on the shelves at Loblaws.

Seeing as the vast majority of those dying from covid are retired (death numbers affect the elderly the most) the labour force is mostly being affected by various gov interfercences in the free market, and the abiity of people to trade with one another without gov poking their nose in.

The jabby papers for restaurants is an illustration. Also many restaurants and hotels, resorts are saying to workers get the jabby or quit. I know this from personal experience. I travelled to BC lately for a break and some golf. I booked some time and a room at a golf resort in the BC interior. On arrival I found I had to show 'papers' to gain entry to the course, and even my hotel/golf resort room. All their workers had to have the jabby too. How many of them quit?

I could not, and would not. They were good enough to refund my money and i went elsewhere.

All (or certainly most) of this supply hoo ha is caused by government spiteful contantly changing array of 'regulations', rules, curfews and the like.

One would think that our gov doesnt actually want small businesses to survive. It's okay for Messers Trudy and co. They still get paid even if we don't.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the data.

Some highlights folks of this data set- https://health-infobase.canada.ca/src/data/covidLive/Epidemiological-summary-of-COVID-19-cases-in-Canada-Canada.ca.pdf

The big Q everyone wants to know is, ok, but.... is it gonna kill yo ass?

Page 24- and one can assume Canada gov figures mean, total so far. 96.3% of those dying of alleged corona or complications thereof, in the hosp are 50> of age. 91.8% are 60> years of age. No data i could find on comorbidities.

However, as of 7th of Jan this year, the CDC dir Dr. Rochelle Walensky stated on 'Good Morning America' that: "...the overwhelming number of death [sic] over 75% occurred in people who had at least 4 comorbidities, so really these are people who were unwell to begin with..." ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hVPz-A8auw )

One could reasonably extrapolate that since the US and Canadian populations are similar in diet, health, genetics, demographics etc that it also applies here.

Okay, so statistically, if you are 50 or under, or even slightly over 50 and perfect BMI and in rude health, the Xi special receipie probably wont kill yo ass.

Of those 'infected' - whats the chance it will again, kill yo unlucky ass? That is, how many people per 100 have died from X?

Page 5- The worst for alleged deaths from the covid is QC at 121,621 out of an alleged 696,182 "Cases" = 1.7% IFR (infection fatality rate), survival rate of 98.2% that didn't die after contracting said alleged covid. This data set we are going with the mainstream accepted narrative that a "positive" test means one is "infected".

Canada as a total: 2,437,822 million folks tested "positive". Of which 30,584 alleged covid deaths - 1.25% IFR, 98.75% survival rate, of the rest that did not die.

Tellingly, this is mostly covid patients or people who had no pre hospital admission treatment, owing to the (in Canada) bizarre nigh on ban on Ivermectin, Budesinide, HCQ, Periactin, Benedryl etc - as Dr. Peter McCullough has illustrated in countless interviews on mainstream, imagine how much lower the small death rate would be if pre admission treatment would be given as a first line, jabbed or not.

Just for shits, let's do the USA & Canada with a different data set Our World In Data: 1.4% of people allegedly died (from? With?) the covid per 100. ( https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-19-cumulative-confirmed-cases-vs-confirmed-deaths?xScale=linear&zoomToSelection=true&country=CAN~USA )

Canada 1.2%

Some interesting juxtaposition to bugs way, way more dangerous - shows that SARS-nCov-2 (The "covid") is a cake walk compared to:

SARS-nCov-1 - The FIRST one. 11%. Eleven percent!

Botulism 10% or less. TREATED! For food poisoning! Yes folks FOOD POISONING has a higher death rate than covid.

Ebola 25% CFR at best. (https://web.archive.org/web/20141214011751/https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/ )

1918 Spanish Flu >2.5% CFR (CFR meaning % of those who were obviously ill, had the spanish flu & either died or survived, instead of IFR which includes "cases" of those a test alleges you have X but felt fine throughout, as well as those who got worse & died)

Legionnaires diesease 15% CFR

Yellow fever 20%

Bubonic plague 60%

3
BritPedeMEGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Hi, Im Carlos. I made a snide patronising holier than thou video about the 'others'. Now Im dead"

There was a time when was willing to let others do what the hell they like and just carry on. You wanna take a jabby? Wear a mask? 2 masks? Wear a freakin body condom as far as I cared. Go nuts. There was a point when they left us alone.

Now 'they', the other 'side' wont leave 'us' alone. Despite all we want to do is go to work, shop, walk around and do the things we want to do as per normal and not care or pay any business what 'they do, we were willing to go to work and shop amongst 'them', and not make a deal out of it. I was willing to give people slack and realise that many got conned into taking it.

But that wasn't good enough for them was it? 90% of the nation jabbed isn't good enough for them. The continue to poke the bear. Mask mandates, jab mandates, Nazi jab papers to enter restaurants, snarky store signs, Karens in the store, Covidiots and Cult Branch Covidians hectoring us online, in the street, in the store, in the restaurant.

We tried to ignore them, to not comment on our jab status, change the subject at work etc. But no, 'they', won't shut up about it.

Well I'm sorry- I'm done. Ive run dry of tolerance, compassion and 'live and let live'.

'They', fired the first shot. The 'othering' started in earnest. Calling us 'plague rats', and now we are beyond contempt level for these people. We are on the outskirts of some not caring if we live or die now. (Spoiler alert: likely we live beyond them)

Fine, they want to play hard ball? Phuq em.

If the 'other' side, are going to be haughty dicks about this, and look at us like filthy non humans, well, they can phuq right off. After many of them may be dead between 1-8 years from now, so the problem of 'othering' will solve itself.

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Real life 'The Onion' and 'Babylon Bee' headlines.

Full "article" from the "journalist"- here: https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/vaccinated-hospital-patients-outpace-the-unvaccinated-but-it-doesn-t-mean-the-shots-don-t-work-experts-1.5730793

How's this for spin:

"As of Thursday, 217 unvaccinated Albertans were in hospital with COVID-19, compared to 282 patients with at least 1 shot.

But almost 90% of the province has one dose, which means the "rate per 100,000 people" is a more telling metric to measure admissions.

By that standard, about 24 unvaccinated people per 100,000 are in an Alberta hospital.

That rate drops to fewer than eight after just one shot. "

Huh? CTV and Dr: 'it doesnt matter because of some statistical jiggery pokery'.

Like....ok? The only number that matters is: Is the number of unjabbed in hospital higher than the jabbed? Yes or no? Oh....it isnt?

But, let's humour them, and go with with their statistical analysis. I'm no maths whizz, but 24 unjabbed people in hosp per 100,000 means 0.024% right? (move the decimal place to the left 3 times).

So thats 1056 allegedly unjabby people (and how are they really defining unjabbed these days? Got it a week ago? A day? 12 days? Only 1 shot? 2?) in a province with 36,000 hospital beds (AHS website). That's 3% at worst.

97% of beds are not taken up by the non jabby having the corona.

Now add on the (in)famously unreliable PCR test at cycle gains to 30+ that could 'find' the Xi bug in a rarified sample of Mars' atmosphere.

Hooooo wee! Hell of a "pandemic" this is.

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fine by me. I have my 6 months worth of dry food prepped and plenty 12 hour candles that generate 5000BTU's if the commies decide to 'accidentally' 'fail' the power plants (a-la the texas whoopsie).

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Apparently she said this on, or around the 7th of Jan 2022 on the 'Good Morning America' programme.

I'm not sure if the meant 75% of people since the very start, 2020, 21.

It's obvious to state that with 4 comorbidities, and advanced age, influenza is well known to push people off this mortal coil too. With the allegation that the (now CDC pooh poohed) PCR test cannot differentiate between influenza, SARS-Cov-1, SARS-Cov-2 (both around 80% similar) , MERS or even a common cold, we shall probably never know just how many old obese diabetic old timers with COPD died due to regular flu instead of the WinnieThePoohFlu.

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well we are at spitting distance ("good way to spread the deadleeeee megatron reeeee") of the country being 90% jabbied.

pop is 38m. 90% of that is 34.2m. We are at about 3.5m or so taking out the very young - and, surely one wouldn't advoate or condone jabbing newborns and toddlers with an experimental rushed to market, injectble liquid with no long term safety studies or full approval - would you?

...and take out the very elderly - whom one could argue ...look they are so frail, lets just let them live out their short years in peace hey?

3.5m sprinkled at say, a rate commensurate with pop density accross the country.

Is anyone seriously arguing that the vast majority of these folks are clogging up the hospitals in record numbers?

Lets say, yes they are. Ok. Simple way to see with your own eyes just who the heck is in the hospitals is to go and look. Occams razor says it's older folks with co-morbidities. There's probably data somewhere. BC CDC's data in 2021 showed it was mostly elderly.

Older folks tend to be retired. That means they aren't in employment. Another common sense extrapolation: if this 'pandemic of the unjabbed' was affecting folks of all working ages at random, in hospital clogging numbers, surely one would hear of people you know and failing that, people you know of people they know, that "oh bill got taken in to hospital with the Xi Disease" , and everyday logistics would be a clusterphuq.

IE, random folks that werent jabbed between prime working age, 16-50 in hospitals in record numbers, meaning postmen, couriers, truckers, warehouse workers, power plant workers, cops, medics, cart pushers, checkout girls, road repair crews, snow ploughers. Basically random folks that keep civilisation running, would be affected so much that you see an effect on the streets.

But we don't.

Weird eh?

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Call me paranoid, but I changed my driving licence and health card to a UPS mailbox address a long way away from my real home address, and have put ownership of my home into an LLC based in the USA.

I reccomend you do the same.

Might delay Mr. Justine Truedope's jabby door squads a while...

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need, just cross the border like all the illegal aliens do.

Oh wait....that only works for Democrat voters.

Chartering a flight is an idea...however, see what Mr. Justine Trudeau's media presstitutes made of the last plane that was hired for a completely private, custom flight?

My god those kids were crucified in the fake news media. "Oh noes! Some young people enjoying themselves on a whole plane they paid for. Dancing and hugging and singing and GASP drinking with no face burkas. Wont someone THINK OF THE CHILDREN OMICRONNNNNN REEEEE"

Etc.

Give it a moment. Im sure Tuchodi will be around shortly to tell eveyone how irresponsible the 'supa spreada' kiddos were.

12
BritPedeMEGA 12 points ago +12 / -0

welp, guess im escaping to the USA, where they have a real constitution.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

what about the W.H.O.? Anyway folks here's something they came out with mid 2020 re infection fatality ratios (IFR).

"Among people <70 years old, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.57% with median of 0.05% across the different locations (corrected median of 0.04%)."

"Findings I included 61 studies (74 estimates) and eight preliminary national estimates. Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 0.02% to 53.40%. Infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 1.63%, corrected values from 0.00% to 1.54%. Across 51 locations, the median COVID-19 infection fatality rate was 0.27% (corrected 0.23%): the rate was 0.09% in locations with COVID-19 population mortality rates less than the global average (<118 deaths/million), 0.20% in locations with 118–500 COVID-19 deaths/million people and 0.57% in locations with

500 COVID-19 deaths/million people. In people younger than 70 years, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% with crude and corrected medians of 0.05%."

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v3

Put the other way around, in jul 2020- kung flu survival rate was at worst, 99.79% in persons <70.

It's from a preprint that was subsequently printed on the Bulletin of the World Health Organization doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.265892

Disclaimer, the data is from july 2020, however an interesting insight as to the early 'peak' of the kungflu phenomenon. It will be interesting to see the updated IFR from 2021 once the powers that be finish crunching the numbers on those <70 with zero comorbidities. (if anyone has this data already please share.)

Also will be interested to see what the excess death numbers are in Canada from 2021 in the back half of 2021, and to see what they are dying of, now that we are practically all (90% jabbied) against the wu flu.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's fine. Hire them all back. For all the Kung Flu fear fans, just have them wear a mask and "PPE".... because, masks work...right?

2
BritPedeMEGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine, a "pandemic", so deadly, making hospitals so busy that they can afford to fire the very same people that help to treat patients?

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone know the latest Canadian infection fatality rate % for those with zero comorbidities/serious conditions and a healthy BMI?

A US or UK one will do, I don't see why we couldnt approximate that to a Canadian pop- similar people mix/diet etc.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you give us a few random SME's so we can look up what they have been saying lately?

Also do these SME's include, im assuming, epidemiologists, virologists, vaccinologists, cardiologists, endochrinologists and the like? Are any countries SME's excluded?

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

im sure tuchodi will be along in a moment to DEEBOOOOONK this....

Sure makes the forum entertaining.

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

i'm sure Tuchodi will be along in a bit to justify this because of XYZ...

1
BritPedeMEGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't the Pfizer early data (that a court had to pry out of their conniving hands) show that about 1200 people died from their Jabba The Hurt in the first 90 days?

I gather Dr. Peter McCullough said that at about 50 deaths, a drug or trial is halted. 50 deaths, not sure if he meant in the USA or worldwide.

Now some would say "well 1200 deaths out of XXX massive number is a small amount" well, ok....but thats no comfort to the families of the dead is it? Oh, you cant sue Pfizer. Too bad so sad.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›