Like the 67% of Canadians who ignore medical advice and choose to be overweight clog up the system.
I bet you’re one of those
There you go making shit up again and spouting off your opinions.
I’ll stick with the science.
You can stick with your politics of promoting people with superior immunity being barred from society.
Then why are these people with this superior protection to those who are just vaccinated barred from society in Canada
Fuck off, just paste the quote in google and hit search, it’s not that hard
Maybe Tudoci can interpret this so we can understand:
‘Children rarely become seriously ill, and knowledge is still limited about rare side effects or side effects that may arise at a distant time. There is little individual benefit for most children, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has not recommended that all children aged 5–11 be vaccinated.
Why would I play your games when you’re still lying about natural immunity
Jesus Christ, click the title link and it’s in the first paragraph.
Fuck
Why do you keep lying about that?
Click the title link, retard.
For clarity I’m not one of those people, I’m actually vaccinated (no I’m not going to prove it, no I don’t care if you believe me), but I’m against discrimination, I’m against taking away people’s rights.
I don’t agree with your political opinion that coercion related to a vaccine with a far lower than 1% IFR, primarily targeting people who are already very sick, is legal or ethical.
It should be personal choice.
I’m mostly interested right now in pointing out the political nature of unscientifically pretending natural immmunity isn’t real, that you’re spreading that misinformation, and shouldn’t be a factor in these evil nazi style health passes.
If I had an immunity from the STI that was superior to the protection from a condom, then yes I would.
Right, you unscientifically advocate those survivors be barred from society
More frequent than the risk of death from covid among 5-9 age group.
“We find that age-specific IFRs estimated by the ensemble model range from 0.001% (95% credible interval, 0–0.001)”
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2918-0
Part of the reason pushing vax on this age group is a crime against humanity.
“ persons who survived a previous infection had lower case rates than persons who were vaccinated alone.”
Is that how condoms work?
Wow that’s a low iq analogy
What are you talking about? People with natural immunity without being vaccinated have superior immunity to the vaccinated alone, according to science.
“It showed that people who survived a previous infection had lower rates of COVID-19 than people who were vaccinated alone.”
But he politically and unscientifically wants those people barred from society while the inferior protected people can have full access.
He cloaks himself in the veil of science, but only when it suits his political agenda.
That’s from the first paragraph lol.
To be clear for everyone else, the link I have supplied on four occasions now has this in it, a few paragraphs from the top.
“natural immunity was a more potent shield than vaccines”
Of course he won’t acknowledge it, and just pretends the words aren’t there.
Don’t fall for this guy’s political agenda.
You and your politics. Pathetic. From primary link:
“Prior COVID infection more protective than vaccination during Delta surge -U.S. study“
I’m not going to hold your hand and have a reading session with you.
Despite your political positions natural immunity is a long held scientific fact.
Certificates of recovery (indicating that a person has recovered from an infection with COVID-19) can only be issued following a positive NAAT (nucleic acid amplification test) such as RT-PCR test. They can be issued 11 days after the date of the initial test.
You’re trying to deflect from the fact that your position is political.
Science demonstrates people with prior infection have superior immunity to those with vaccine derived immunity.
That’s a fact.
It’s also a fact that you want them barred from public life for political reasons.
Science shows antibodies from natural immunity are superior to artificially generated immunity because antibodies from natural immunity recognize multiple parts of the virus instead of just the spike protein.
What you’re alluding to is that people with antibodies from a natural infection can be reinfected while a person with vaccine derived antibodies cannot. That is another desperate attempt to spread misinformation to support your political agenda.
The CDC refuses to acknowledge natural immunity because it wants to support its political position that everyone possible is vaccinated regardless of immunity status. Of course this type of political behaviour is one of the reasons people with free thought have lost trust in many institutions.
The EU recognizes natural immunity however from test results, including rapid antigen.
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/coronavirus/eu-digital-covid-certificate/
Right, of course, you’re more of a politics guys.
Covid antibody test proves immunity. It’s called science.
People with natural immunity are scientifically shown to be protected.
If someone were immune to gonorrhoea should they be forced by politicians to choose between wearing a condom and not having sex with their partner?
Okay now about the superior natural immunity, which is superior to the vax, according to science? That most other countries recognize?
I posted an article from 3 days ago that says natural immunity is superior to vax immunity.
You still want those people locked in their homes against the science