I can't tell if we're sticking to the thread or wandering off into the weeds. Are you one of those "I'm in good health so I don't need a vaccine" people? Would you have unprotected sex with someone with an STI.
In other words: you wouldn't, because you don't have immunity from the STIs - like you don't have immunity from covid - and your glowing good health is no defense.
For clarity I’m not one of those people, I’m actually vaccinated (no I’m not going to prove it, no I don’t care if you believe me), but I’m against discrimination, I’m against taking away people’s rights.
I don’t agree with your political opinion that coercion related to a vaccine with a far lower than 1% IFR, primarily targeting people who are already very sick, is legal or ethical.
It should be personal choice.
I’m mostly interested right now in pointing out the political nature of unscientifically pretending natural immmunity isn’t real, that you’re spreading that misinformation, and shouldn’t be a factor in these evil nazi style health passes.
It's real, but you have to survive covid to get it - and millions have not. Plus it isn't as good as getting vaccinated after you've recovered. By doing that you lessen the load on the healthcare system.
“ persons who survived a previous infection had lower case rates than persons who were vaccinated alone.”
Is that how condoms work?
Wow that’s a low iq analogy
I can't tell if we're sticking to the thread or wandering off into the weeds. Are you one of those "I'm in good health so I don't need a vaccine" people? Would you have unprotected sex with someone with an STI.
If I had an immunity from the STI that was superior to the protection from a condom, then yes I would.
In other words: you wouldn't, because you don't have immunity from the STIs - like you don't have immunity from covid - and your glowing good health is no defense.
There you go making shit up again and spouting off your opinions.
I’ll stick with the science.
You can stick with your politics of promoting people with superior immunity being barred from society.
For clarity I’m not one of those people, I’m actually vaccinated (no I’m not going to prove it, no I don’t care if you believe me), but I’m against discrimination, I’m against taking away people’s rights.
I don’t agree with your political opinion that coercion related to a vaccine with a far lower than 1% IFR, primarily targeting people who are already very sick, is legal or ethical.
It should be personal choice.
I’m mostly interested right now in pointing out the political nature of unscientifically pretending natural immmunity isn’t real, that you’re spreading that misinformation, and shouldn’t be a factor in these evil nazi style health passes.
It's real, but you have to survive covid to get it - and millions have not. Plus it isn't as good as getting vaccinated after you've recovered. By doing that you lessen the load on the healthcare system.
Then why are these people with this superior protection to those who are just vaccinated barred from society in Canada