First, you have to survive covid to get it. And then you should get vaccinated.
"Emerging evidence shows that getting a COVID-19 vaccine after you recover from COVID-19 infection provides added protection to your immune system. One study showed that, for people who already had COVID-19, those who do not get vaccinated after their recovery are more than 2 times as likely to get COVID-19 again than those who get fully vaccinated after their recovery." https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html
I can't tell if we're sticking to the thread or wandering off into the weeds. Are you one of those "I'm in good health so I don't need a vaccine" people? Would you have unprotected sex with someone with an STI.
For clarity I’m not one of those people, I’m actually vaccinated (no I’m not going to prove it, no I don’t care if you believe me), but I’m against discrimination, I’m against taking away people’s rights.
I don’t agree with your political opinion that coercion related to a vaccine with a far lower than 1% IFR, primarily targeting people who are already very sick, is legal or ethical.
It should be personal choice.
I’m mostly interested right now in pointing out the political nature of unscientifically pretending natural immmunity isn’t real, that you’re spreading that misinformation, and shouldn’t be a factor in these evil nazi style health passes.
Continuing to perpetuate the unscientific political position that natural immunity isn’t superior to the vaccine.
We don’t trust your politicians who veil themselves in the cloak of science.
Is natural immunity science or not?
If it is how do you justify this comparison and these unethical measures against that group??
First, you have to survive covid to get it. And then you should get vaccinated.
"Emerging evidence shows that getting a COVID-19 vaccine after you recover from COVID-19 infection provides added protection to your immune system. One study showed that, for people who already had COVID-19, those who do not get vaccinated after their recovery are more than 2 times as likely to get COVID-19 again than those who get fully vaccinated after their recovery." https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html
and
"Before Delta became the predominant variant in June, case rates were higher among persons who survived a previous infection than persons who were vaccinated alone. By early October, persons who survived a previous infection had lower case rates than persons who were vaccinated alone." https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm?s_cid=mm7104e1_e&ACSTrackingID=USCDC_921-DM73434&ACSTrackingLabel=MMWR%20Early%20Release%20-%20Vol.%2071%2C%20January%2019%2C%202022&deliveryName=USCDC_921-DM73434
“ persons who survived a previous infection had lower case rates than persons who were vaccinated alone.”
Is that how condoms work?
Wow that’s a low iq analogy
I can't tell if we're sticking to the thread or wandering off into the weeds. Are you one of those "I'm in good health so I don't need a vaccine" people? Would you have unprotected sex with someone with an STI.
If I had an immunity from the STI that was superior to the protection from a condom, then yes I would.
For clarity I’m not one of those people, I’m actually vaccinated (no I’m not going to prove it, no I don’t care if you believe me), but I’m against discrimination, I’m against taking away people’s rights.
I don’t agree with your political opinion that coercion related to a vaccine with a far lower than 1% IFR, primarily targeting people who are already very sick, is legal or ethical.
It should be personal choice.
I’m mostly interested right now in pointing out the political nature of unscientifically pretending natural immmunity isn’t real, that you’re spreading that misinformation, and shouldn’t be a factor in these evil nazi style health passes.
it's not a vaccine. you are spreading lies by calling it a vaccine. it's poison
You're entitled to your opinion. but you shouldn't be getting it from social media.
I do my own research. Unlike you, who parrots satanists.