6
CanadianRighty 6 points ago +6 / -0

A society that would use children to shield the elderly doesn’t deserve to survive, and it won’t.

A precious child is worth more than all of the 80 year olds.

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberal areas are always the worst.

Of course Liberals are too stupid and disingenuous to draw a parallel between cause and effect.

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look how low the risk is for everyone except the 70+ crowd.

Liberals don't care about real world data, they only care about their political agenda.

0.0% risk of death among 12 - 18 year olds, but Liberals don't want the to have a choice.

Your body Tuchodi's choice.

7
CanadianRighty 7 points ago +7 / -0

0.0%

The risk of covid to 12 - 18 year olds is 0.0% according to the government of Canada. Full stop.

0.0%

Is your minuscule brain capable of understanding what 0.0% means?

Where is your proof the vaccine lowers the risk for 12 - 18 year olds below 0.0%?

YOURE THE ONE WHO ADVOCATES FOR MANDATES AGAINST PERSONAL BODILY AUTONOMY YOU SICK FUCK, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU, RETARD.

Inject yourself with a million doses (god please do), leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

Jesus Liberals like Tuchodi are morons.

It's time we ask ourselves, do we continue to tolerate these people?

5
CanadianRighty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Repeat after me Tuchodi “health Canada data advertises that 0.0% of 12 - 18 year olds have died of covid.”

Will you admit the fact that the vaccines can cause permanent injury and death to 12 - 18 year olds?

You evil sick monster.

6
CanadianRighty 6 points ago +6 / -0

“That would only be true if no children had died. I know you aren't claiming that no children have died.”

  • 0.0% is from health Canada, you’ve interacted with that data you slimy liar.

“Children younger than 12 years, 4 months have always been able to travel. You probably mean teenagers.”

-Teenagers are children by definition retard. You want their rights taken away at Justin Trudeau’s political whim for a 0.0% risk.

Just like your Liberal masters youre always lying.

Eat shit evil Liberal cunt.

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Incorrect they were filming both Topp and the crowd. He was in the video almost the entire time. Did we watch the same video?

You’ve chosen to try and raise skepticism against Topp by guessing he’s a bad actor without anything.

You could review the info already posted, including a post yesterday you interacted with, which answer your questions- why didn’t you review any info?

He was fired from Armed Forces for refusing vax.

He chose to March to Ottawa in protest.

Mainstream media refuses to cover the story since they’re in Trudeaus pocket.

The video showing the crowd is to demonstrate that this is a real thing, it’s actually critical to have this video to further indict the media.

It seems more likely that you’re the bad actor.

9
CanadianRighty 9 points ago +9 / -0

You admit 0.0% is the risk to children of death from covid, yet you advocate restricting their movement if they haven’t received the injections, at your master Justin Trudeau’s whim.

It’s a fact that you would put the lives of children at risk in an attempt to protect adults. Reminds me of the Mayans and child sacrifice.

You’re a truly evil wretch.

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you watch the video? It's of cars honking for and people cheering for and hugging Topp.

Please enlighten us as to what the story is?

Do you have any basis for your skepticism of Topp?

Please let us know specifically what makes you suspect he might be a "psyop like Bernier".

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reuters pumps out plenty of trash.

I don’t accept news articles from any source or side as gospel, that’s more of a leftist type behaviour.

7
CanadianRighty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes that’s exactly correct.

I wrote the title quickly after seeing the announcement, but it’s totally wrong.

They also talked about changing the definition of fully vaxxed to 3 doses, which frankly I hope they do.

China, North Korea and Trudeau’s Canada, three peas in a pod.

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

🤣

Hopefully you're wrong about the AIDS thing, given how many people took the clotshot (including myself unfortunately)

Then again maybe my death from AIDS would be worth it if it meant the Liberals would be wiped out permanently.

Already settled it in my head. I'll take AIDS if it means all the Liberals have AIDS too.

😂

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

To say he hasn’t done anything in his political career isn’t giving the devil his due imo.

It’s my impression he orchestrated or at least was fundamental in unseating the “centrist” O’Toole/establishment faction.

He’s drawn crowds from Calgary to Toronto, and allegedly sold 300k CPC memberships.

He sat idly by within the OToole crowd who cheered on the covidian authoritarianism, so like you I’m nowhere near trusting of him.

I won’t call him “a heck of a guy” at this point, but I think he’s already accomplished in politics.

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

6 year olds aren’t supposed to have sexuality , these perverts are groomers

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people are absolute trash, and Canada isn’t far behind

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

The header mentions <Supporters with a negative view are up seven points; supporters with a positive view are down eight points

But fails to mention Pierre still has 42% "positive impression" and 14% "negative impression", and roughly double the support of Charest (44% vs 23%).

Unsurprising from a polling firm whose chairman published a hit tweet on Poilievre a few weeks ago.

https://abacusdata.ca/conservative-leadership-canadian-politics-may-25/

https://twitter.com/bruceanderson/status/1523661379571355648

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›