3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t stare at the eclipse. Wait until it passes and then stare at the bare sun. This will give your eyes some essential vitamin D.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks capitalism? Did you type this on your iPhone or desktop computer?

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

She got it wrong, though. “Eventually” implies that it happens gradually over time. Things go to shit fast.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

I debunked this study that you posted a billion times.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

The government should cap how much profit Walmart is allowed to make, amirite?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m with you, man. People are dumb. Reminds me of my neighbor, Dave. He smokes 2 packs a day and is the healthiest guy in the neighborhood. And they try to tell us that smoking is bad for you. Pffft.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals labeling their degenerate policies as progressive is actually brilliant marketing. Whoever came up with that deserves a raise.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Real estate millionaire and former president. I don’t think career loser is an appropriate description. How’s your career doing, though?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

tar baby - a difficult problem that is only aggravated by attempts to solve it. "disposal of nuclear waste was a problem whose solution was endlessly delayed, a tar baby no one wanted anything to do with"

And there’s a second racist definition.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post hoc fallacies are committed when one argues that because B happened immediately after A, A must be the cause of B. The point is not that there can’t be a causal connection between A and B but rather that there isn’t adequate evidence for the conclusion.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fox isn’t the source. They’re just one of the very few media outlets reporting this. this is the source

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s quite a way to say that you were wrong and agree with me.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don’t need to be an infectious disease expert to interpret infectious disease data, retard. You do, however, need to be an expert in interpreting statistical data. The author has a phd in stats. She’s fully qualified to interpret the data.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Government is the reason you don't have to

This mindset is the reason that you and most of the population never amount to anything

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your question is particularly funny because you’ve been claiming 1% covid death rate until I corrected you only just recently.

0
DoggyDawg 0 points ago +1 / -1

My neighbor, Dave, is conservative. He cares about a lot of the people in the neighborhood.

0
DoggyDawg 0 points ago +1 / -1

The hat makes her look taller 😎

0
DoggyDawg 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m pro-abortion. Even still, you gotta look at who’s producing these studies.

Disclosing a conflict of interest, one of the authors is also a plaintiff in several lawsuits challenging abortion restriction in the state of Montana and has received personal fees from the Society of Family Planning Stipend as well as grants from other groups to conduct the study.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›