The media is out to cancel Jean Chretien because of his comments on residential schools. We'll see if he really likes putting pepper on that steak.
That is all.
CBC's The National interviewed the insufferable Killary about her "fiction" book and never once asked her about the accusations leveled at her husband by several women or about his close relationship to Epstein. Talk about women empowerment. They did ask her if orange man bad.
"In a key development, Iceland on Friday, October 8, decided to halt the use of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine citing growing concerns over risks of heart inflammation. According to a statement published on the website of the Health Directorate, the country's chief epidemiologist decided to suspend the use of the Moderna vaccine"
Other Nordic countries suspended the use for young people. Bjork-land has taken it a step further and outright suspended the use for everyone. So, the rare side-effects of this vaccine are not so rare after all. Notice how they waited until most of the population was vaccinated to suspend the use of this drug.
Will Canada follow suit? Isn't it unethical to coerce people into taking a chemical that causes health problems? Who's up for a field trip to Nuremberg?
As governments and business happily coerce and cajole the Canadian population into taking a potentially dangerous vaccine, here are some of the reasons why some Canadians sacrificed their lives.
Five of the Most Heinous Nazi Medical Experiments
Whoever you are, wherever you are, if you helped in forcing and coercing people into taking this vaccine, rest assured, we will never forget what you have done.
I know that some of us will take exactly 0 shots of this "vaccine." What about the general population who is more supportive of vaccines? Will they be willing to roll up their sleeves once or twice a year for the rest of their lives?
Many highly vaccinated places are seeing a surge in covid (like Singapore, Israel, and New England), so this is an indication that the virus will be here for a while because among other things, the vaccine is leaky, so we'll need booster shots every year. The side effects will begin piling up, and the potential for ADE increases with each variant in the wild. Will people be okay with the jabs every year, or will they feel that they have done their part and so no more jabs?
Cunts.
Federal public servants, RCMP and air and rail travellers must be vaccinated by month's end, Trudeau says
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-vaccine-mandate-1.6201528
The chances of suffering heart problems with the moderna jab are rare, they say. So rare that Ontario does not recommend it if you're young. Instead, they want you to take the Pfizer shot because your chances of rare heart problems are super rare. If you still want to take moderna, even with rare side effects, then sign the informed consent form, which protects them if you suffer the rare problems. Better to take Pfizer because rare side effects are super rare, and if you suffer super-rare rare side effects, which are rare, then the super-rare rare side effects are still your responsibility. Got it?
Bring up Ivermectin on any lefty forum or platform, and you will immediately find yourself in a swamp of hate and censorship. Why is that? You would think that we would all be interested in a drug that is cheap, safe, and effective. I suspect big pharma use their billions to hire shills that attack anyone who dares to suggest that a cheap, safe, and effective drug could be a viable alternative to their cash-cow vaccines. But I also think there's more to it than just profits. It's also about power.
Leftists are obsessed with dominating and dictating people's lives. They hate the idea of self determination and freedom of choice, except when it suits them. Ivermectin, which is readily available and cheap, puts control of healthcare in the hands of the people, not some bureaucrat or "health professional." I think that they hate rapid testing for the same reason. If you can quickly and accurately determine whether or not you're sick, then maybe a vaccine is not needed, and you get to decide which one you prefer. Can't have that. This is why I think there's so much push back against Ivermectin and other readily available remedies, vitamins, and supplements. It's not just about health and the lost profits for Big Pharma. Ivermectin wrestles power away from institutional bureaucracy and puts it squarely in the hands of the individual. An abhorrent idea to those who would rather have you in chains.
I'm happy that witch is out of Canada and our hostages have been freed, but let's face it, we lost this battle. I think that regardless of who we voted for, we can at least all agree on this:
FUCK CHINA! FUCK XIDEN! FUCK WINNIE THE POOH!
Can't fix stupid. Get bent PPC voters. Enjoy the Big T in the coming years.
So what's the soonest we can tell O'Toole to fuck off?
"According to what one of the elders said, taking an enemy on the battlefield is like a hawk taking a bird. Even though it enters into the midst of a thousand of them, it gives no attention to any bird than the one it first marked."
Ghost Dog: The way of the Samurai
You are the hawk. Trudeau is the bird. O'Toole is your sword. Don't forget.
Until Sunday, when I come back, and blow your minds with my post. My post will be so powerful that it will convince you not to be a fucking idiot and throw away your vote by voting PPC, then get Trudeau elected. Come on, lads. We're close. Hold the fucking line, don't split it!
FREE
CANADA
DOT WIN
That's what he promised. He will send his little lapdog Steven Guilbeault to censor online free speech in the guise of targeting hate speech and white supremacy.
In tonight's soft ball interview with Barton on the CBC, he also mentioned that he's losing his patience with the unvaccinated and Canadians need to be protected from them. This motherfucker is going to go full Castro on us if we don't vote him out.
I watched the debate and I thought that O'Toole had a good night. He came across as the most reasonable on stage and did not make any major blunders.
Trudeau seemed flustered because he's probably not used to being questioned on anything.
Singh came across as superficial with his canned phrases that amount to "socialism good."
The Green Party leader was good at quips, but there's little substance there. At one point she said, "in my culture," when referencing her ethnic background. She wants to be the leader of Canada but doesn't consider herself part of Canadian culture?
The dude from Quebec was weird. He got easily triggered and his stiff French quirkiness made me chuckle.
So, overall I think O'Toole had a good debate, and this eases some of the concerns I had with him as a possible leader of this country. Yes, I know he's not pure right wing, but this strategy paid off. The media tried to play gotcha with him, but given that his stand on many issues are not "far right," there was little to criticize. Overall, a solid performance.
The American right wingers are always thumbing their noses at Canada for being cucked. We're about to see how based they really are. My prediction is that just like the stolen election, they'll put their tails between their legs and just take it. I hope I'm wrong, and they fight back, but I'm afraid that as we've already seen on January 6th, their bark is worse than their bite.
The liberal vote, that is. The media has been giving positive coverage to Singh while playing hardball with Trudeau (in relative comparison). Even they are sick of Trudeau. This is positive for us because if the left is split, then they will not rally around a single leader. The math works in our favour. Divide and conquer.
