everyone can tell you're in the closet, dude.
Might as well just accept yourself and ditch this shitstorm of a fash-ish movement you've attached yourself to.
You fell for someone who's obviously grifting the vaccine hesitant? You're just an NPC at this point.
I wish it was but since roe v wade Alabama banned all abortions except when medically necessary to save the mother's life. Even for rape and or incest.
https://alabamapolicy.org/2022/06/24/abortionfaq/
Except in cases where abortion is necessary in order to save the life of the mother or to prevent a serious health risk to her, which is closely defined, it bans all abortions. There are no exceptions for rape or incest.
Meanwhile in the real world - he's a world class criminal and only pathetic losers who fell for his many grifts still support him. Not surprised to find you among the shit stained maga crowd.
Yeah, I remember some bootlickers trying to occupy their countries capitals. Unhinged.
Hey AmericanNazi you still didn't provide your abundance of proof.
Just a reminder to dear readers that the anti vax troll got not one but two whole jabs and should probably just shut the fuck up about shit they don't understand.
In terms of data representation, it's true that how data is presented can greatly influence how it's perceived. Sometimes, adjusting the y-axis scale can create a misleading impression about the relative sizes of different effects. If this were the case with the original Lancet chart, your concern would be valid. It's important to interpret data with care and understand the full context in which it's presented.
However, it's also important to consider that Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal, often publishes scientific research that has been rigorously reviewed by experts in the field. It's unlikely that they would intentionally publish misleading data. Sometimes, the scale of the y-axis is changed for practical reasons such as visibility of data, and not necessarily to intentionally skew perception.
On the topic of cold vs heat related deaths, it's complex. While cold-related deaths may numerically exceed those related to heat in certain geographical areas, it's important to understand the nuanced factors behind these statistics. Cold-related deaths could be related to numerous factors such as inadequate housing or clothing, access to heat, and underlying health conditions that make certain populations more vulnerable.
In the context of climate change, a rise in heat-related deaths is a significant concern because it's a relatively new and escalating threat that's driven by human action. While it may currently cause fewer deaths than cold weather, that doesn't make it less worthy of attention.
It's also worth considering that even if a graph shows that cold weather currently causes more deaths, it doesn't necessarily mean that we should ignore the potential dangers and future impacts of increasing heat waves, which are projected to become more frequent and severe due to climate change.
In conclusion, while it's important to critically evaluate how data is presented and to ensure that it isn't misleading, it's also important to consider the full context and complexities of the data being shown.
I hear you. Normal everyday people do indeed vote conservative. However that's not to say that it's the right choice for them or our society as a whole. Ford cut wildfire money and now we have to breathe smoke through the summer - they want to privatize healthcare which is the dumbest thing I've ever heard since they could instead stop overworking and cutting our current healthcare but aren't on purpose - they also suck the dick of property overlords which makes the cost of living crises worse.. liberals are only slightly better which is why we need to unite and give the NDP a chance. We deserve a leader with a cool turbin he might actually do some good for society.
You're so fucking ignorant.
..it projected, disgustingly.
I've got an itch for the rich would have been a good title too
The contribution of the brainwashed right, folks. Nothing to add because they're objectively wrong in every way
Lmao you're grasping at straws.
Hey persecution fetish, what's the average age a child goes to church for the first time? First communion/baptism?
Is story time really the biggest concern in your life when priests are actually abusing kids daily? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/05/23/nearly-2000-children-sexually-abused-by-catholic-leaders-in-illinois/70247971007/
has nothing to do except that your side has no logic to stand on just radicalization and ignorance. Vaccines have always been a way of life, and before that people just died of disease.
Before polio vaccines became available in the 1950s, polio paralyzed more than 15,000 people each year in the United States. Thanks to widespread polio vaccination in the United States, wild polio has been eliminated – with no cases occurring in the country since 1979.
Unabashed ignorance.
The study found that overall, the excess death rate for Republican voters was 5.4 percentage points, or 76%, higher than the excess death rate for Democratic voters. After COVID-19 vaccines became widely available, the excess death rate gap between Republicans and Democrats widened from 1.6 percentage points to 10.4 percentage points.
“The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available,” the authors said in the study.
Like these facts? You don't know how to deal in facts, only spam, multiple account front page manipulation, and retarded shilling for you.
"altering my RNA" lmfao
No, that's you with convicted rapist trump
You're twisted. Get better.
Seriously take some frickin mushrooms man stop being a little bitch.
They're trying to hide an actual analysis of Canada's situation. Why is that? Are they landlord boot licking betas?
Your guys' homoerotic obsession with him is unhealthy.