1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/getting-started-icsr-submission-fdas-electronic-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system-evaers

Read the steps.

That form you reference is just the onboarding step 1.

You will be rejected if you do not do the next steps.

So no "just anyone" cannot make a submission.

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html

Healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:

Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccinations An adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine

You are the liar. This is the official reporting system required by law for healthcare professionals. By claiming "anyone can use it" is an attempt to discredit it.

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

That form requires a medical report otherwise it gets rejected like here in Canada. Sure you can start the process as anyone, but VAERS has a moderation team like any system.

One thing you fail to note is this system is legally required by healthcare professionals to submit claims through.

What you do when you diminish a legally required reporting system is you create distrust in something healthcare professionals must report to

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

VAers, like our Canadian reporting system does not allow "just anyone". You hav to have a doctors report or some other report to submit to the VAers system to complete all steps.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same beliefs were used to cover up for drugs that ended up harming people long term. By chilling disclosure you cause both doctors and patients to ignore symptoms and get needed care.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dismissing a gov run agency in the US that requires all doctors to report any out of ordinary occurence after being injected with an emergency use authorization untested drug is very dangerous.

It creates a chill in reporting by labeling doctors as quacks and reducing care in those that may need it

by Smeg
2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lipid nanoparticles patents pay big bucks like FTX sponsorship

5
bobbydriscolsgoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

An article posted by someone who has this bio:

THEY/THEM, perennial basement dweller, entirely remote dog walker and the Coconut Creek Florida holder for most Funko Pops ever inserted into a human anus at one time, Doreen takes an extremely serious approach to the Global COVID-19 Pandemic and current political affairs. Emotionally and mentally scarred by the events of Jan 6th, Doreen devotes much of their time to reporting on dangerous misinformation and fighting for LGBTQIAP+++ rights.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you take the kill shot and have a bad time you have an option - what a black pill.

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your mom has a content blocker for anything but left wing propaganda.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chris Sky seems to be informed and immune from accountability. I wonder why?

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you are ever wondering if you are talking to a living breathing person on the internet realise that the technology exists to generate real conversations in the speed of light.

A little off topic for Omega but sometimes there are bots you come across that seem to capture quotes and throw them back in split seconds.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. Single source contract.

Having friends like that feed me a ~3 million profit no tender contract would be awesome.

4
bobbydriscolsgoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Additionally have you ever wondered why lipid nanoparticles are combined with ethanol/poly ethylene glycol?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6385765/

Also:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-022-00755-x

Is this why the study that showed the creation of new DNA in the liver (cancer) is possible?

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/study-lund-university-didnt-show-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-change-dna-epoch-times/

(This is the fact check that says basically the study doesn't prove it does change dna, only that it is possible)

4
bobbydriscolsgoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's just money. I have an old friend who makes all his money posting on Facebook positive messages about vax use.

Don't believe the trolls are authentic - they just sold their souls to make a buck

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe you may be right but there are layers that protect the guilty from being exposed.

5
bobbydriscolsgoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which is the worst: lipids collecting in your brain, liver, heart, lungs, legs, or pancreas? They collect randomly depending on your physical predilection so i guess it's another form of gambling but with ethel-alcohol wrapped delivery to circumvent your natural defenses.

Liver inflammation is hepatitis Heart is myocarditis Lungs is clots Brain is aneurism, ms, altziemers, aphasia, etc.

Who owns part of the University of BC spun company that owns the patents on lipids?

5
bobbydriscolsgoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

So what they are saying is the vax is equivalent to taking lava internally? Terrible idea in either case but maybe I don't get the mental gymnastics required to understand the logical fallacy.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's no context to "died of".

Generally speaking you die "with" COVID and another issue leads to your death. Very few people die "of" COVID.

Kind of like people don't die of "suddenly".

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah no info on mortality cause or associated mortality just opinion based reporting.

This could be anything including most medical folks are liberals and hospital policies foment ventilators and harse treatments like that but liberals knew this caused adverse deaths. So did they protect the like minded but "let the others go". Maybe the treatment was different vaxed vs unvaxed (at one point ventilators were only being assigned to unvaxed as it was believed the vaxed could not catch COVID so treatment was different leading to excess deaths in unvaxed to "prove a point" possibly?).

As you've said before there's a lot of nuance.

4
bobbydriscolsgoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

The educational system breeds this special form of cult like behavior.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why settle if they are going to change the goalpost anyway. Settling is just another form of theft imho.

Go to court and prove it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›