LOL You are deluded if you think the Cons will do ANY of those things.

They are so scared shitless of the left that they wouldn't even be able to review funding for CBC, let alone touch carbon policy/immigration/COVID BS/

Balancing the budget would be so unpopular among the gimme crowd that it is virtually impossible to enact, let alone get elected on. People are just too fucking stupid to understand that 'government money' is simply their own money being borrowed from future taxpayers.

Not to mention the cuts needed just to 'balance' the budget. We would likely have to deport several thousand 'refugees' from our gimme system, considering our tax base has eroded like the coast of Newfoundland. Cons dont have the stomach for that.

Not to mention the media would align against them, just like the US did against Trump, except the Cons are establishment pussies (See what O'Toole did to Sloan?) so they will fall right in line.

how many Con governments have there been, and yet, FN still has shitty drinking water. Hmmmmmmmmm. its almost as if all these fuckin parties are the same.

Voting Con is like giving up alcoholism for chain smoking unfiltered cigs. Yeah you made a change, you are still gonna fuck yourself.

BTW Macleans is fuckin retarded, I wouldn't use it to wipe my ass. Except maybe their article on Ron Maclean...

Reducing even skilled immigration levels if/when post-covid unemployment is high (which it will be for years) vs keeping the flood gates open regardless of unemployment levels?

O'Foole says he'll reduce skilled migration during the Covid recession, but he'll make up for it with family-based migration, which is much, much worse. From the document you linked:

... If unemployment remains high, an O’Toole government will shift the immigration stream from Skilled Workers to a higher proportion of Family Reunification applicants. ...

As long as the immigration continues, the differences between Turdeau and O'Foole are meaningless. Everything stands or falls with immigration. Immigration isn't a minor policy issue any more, like it was in the 1970s. It's the single biggest threat Cuckistan faces if it wishes to survive. If the immigration doesn't change and drastically, a lot of people are going to have to switch countries or adjust to a turd world existence in a dirty, commie Chinada.

Balanced budgets vs massive deficits?

What is the timeline for balanced budgets under a CPC government? 10 years, speak when they are voted out for a Liberal government again.

Ending cooperate welfare vs keeping it?

Good joke. Nobody in Canada will end corporate welfare. They are all happy to throw billions at Bombardier and Co, doesn't matter if it's Harper, Trudope or the next PM.

...

Seriously? All of those policies are identical, even though they're complete opposites? Wut?

"Policies". The CBC will be still tax payer funded, the military will never get new gear, clean drinking water didn't happen under Harper and won't happen under Trudeau or the next PM, the 3rd country loophole won't be closed because the US will never accept the change, O'Toole will get us the same "skilled" immigrants as Trudeau and Harper, there still will be purity tests (see Sloan), equalization payments will be as high as today (the CPC will ignore it to not offend their voters in Quebec and the Altantics) and so on.

The list you posted is a pipe dream. Even Keystone XL has a higher chance to happen. I bet that O'Toole will even change his tone on the carbon tax if he ever gets in office.

Still a shit sandwich, they just change the condiments.