You're thinking about libertarianism. Under patriarchal traditionalism, there should be some form of enforced monogamy, if only because without strong families, you can't have a strong society.
If you can't find a woman, then you don't have anything to offer. Welcome to the world.
JFL at this. The biggest mistake Western man ever made was care about what women think. Feminism is the original degeneracy.
You're thinking about Communism where daddy state gets you everything, including your wife.
But you know, in such case you would end up with 250 lbs hambeast and then you would start to complain why the state is forcing you to date this woman. Stop asking the government to solve your problems or it will solve it in a way you don't like. The reason you're alone and post such shit is because you're a failure at life.
You're thinking about Communism where daddy state gets you everything, including your wife.
No I'm not. You don't understand the difference between communism and patriarchy if you think communism is about enforcing monogamy and establishing strong families in Western societies. Go consult a dictionary.
But you know, in such case you would end up with 250 lbs hambeast and then you would start to complain why the state is forcing you to date this woman.
Enforced monogamy just means everyone eventually has to pair up, not that you would be forced to date any specific person.
Stop asking the government to solve your problems or it will solve it in a way you don't like.
Feminism is government intrusion. If you support feminism, you support government stepping in to "solve" problems.
That said, if we abolished feminism, as well as every other social welfare policy, society would have to return to a traditional patriarchal order.
The reason you're alone and post such shit is because you're a failure at life.
Classic feminist shaming language. Female mating habits are naturally discriminatory and ultimately disruptive. If strong families are the backbone of strong societies, then female mating habits should be regulated for the benefit of all.
Give it up dude. You will die alone. And that's even okay, because your DNA which has absolutely no value for humanity (I would even say it is bad for humanity) and it will vanish from the gene pool.
You are not alone because of feminism. You are alone because you don't have anything to offer. If a woman with your characteristics would pass you on the street, you would be disgusted by her and so are women with you. Now stop asking the government to regulate your private life like the good little communist you are.
How do you know I'm even single? As if being in a relationship and supporting enforced monogamy are mutually exclusive categories. Grow up.
If a woman with your characteristics would pass you on the street, you would be disgusted by her and so are women with you.
This shows a complete ignorance of evolutionary biology. And is a false equivalency. No woman has any difficulty attracting a partner, but many men do.
Now stop asking the government to regulate your private life like the good little communist you are.
How is demanding the abolition of feminism not demanding the end of government regulation in private life? Since feminism is just that, government regulation.
Again, patriarchy is not communism. Please use a dictionary.
How many times am I going to have to repeat myself?
This shows a complete ignorance of evolutionary biology. And is a false equivalency. No woman has any difficulty attracting a partner, but many men do.
There are a lot of 300 lbs lonely single mothers out there which would be more than happy with a catch like you. You both deserve each other.
How is demanding the abolition of feminism not demanding the end of government regulation in private life?
Tell me how enforcing to date someone and enforced monogamy aren't regulations of your private life. I'm more than happy to hear your "explanation".
Again, patriarchy is not communism. Please use a dictionary.
Here is a documentary about a society you would like, Hutterites:
They have all your favourite policies. They are Conservative, they are Christian, they don't support feminism, women have nothing to say, a pure patriarchy, they enforce monogamy. And you know what they also call themselves, Communists. This is the society you want. A collective. A Communist collective.
And the mantra "if you can't find a woman, you have nothing to offer" is even true today, feminism doesn't matter. Stop pushing away blame from you, when you are the cause and the solution of your problems.
so if you think the reason is because all the young men became losers that sounds like some female supremacy ideology.
I would the same thing to a woman. You're making it into a men vs women thing. The number of young people which aren't in a relationship isn't only because men are alone. The number also went up for women.
And that chart doesn't account for demographics, white canadians have half the birth rate of muslims.
It's not half. It's 2.4 vs 1.5. And if you read even the article linked by OP you will see that Muslims which are born in Canada have more or less the same birth rate than a White Canadian woman. Only first generation immigrants have significantly higher birth rates.
So ur comparing the 70s when we were 95% white to today when 1/5th of the country is foreign born.
And in the 1970s where Canada was 95% white the fertility rate was at 1.7 for White women. Today it's at 1.5. What a collapse.
and the fertility rate is still doing down
And it's for all races, not only white people. And why the fuck should I give a shit about the fertility rate in the US?
So why did the fertility rate of usa drop from 2.1 to 1.7 in the span of 10 years? Did they all just get the pill in 2007?
Oh, what happened in 2007? Maybe there was a big recession which squashed millions of dreams ...
In my naive way I think that if our culture shifted so that marriages were 7 year renewable contracts, and the wee peasants who think they deserve a $30,000 wedding ceremony were publicly shamed for being vapid and financially irresponsible, then more people would be getting together.
You guys have such limited imaginations. It would be the sane, balanced right determining marriage and family policies, not the shrieking harpies of the left.
That's exactly the compromise position I've arrived at. I had a trip to Burma planned that got cancelled by COVID, but other than that I've made no unnecessary concessions to the government's medical tyranny regime.
You want forced dating? Are a retard or an incel?
How the fuck is this upvoted on a Conservative forum?
The government forcing people to date? Even more government intrusion? What's next? The government forcing people to have kids?
If you can't find a woman, then you don't have anything to offer. Welcome to the world.
You're thinking about libertarianism. Under patriarchal traditionalism, there should be some form of enforced monogamy, if only because without strong families, you can't have a strong society.
JFL at this. The biggest mistake Western man ever made was care about what women think. Feminism is the original degeneracy.
You're thinking about Communism where daddy state gets you everything, including your wife.
But you know, in such case you would end up with 250 lbs hambeast and then you would start to complain why the state is forcing you to date this woman. Stop asking the government to solve your problems or it will solve it in a way you don't like. The reason you're alone and post such shit is because you're a failure at life.
No I'm not. You don't understand the difference between communism and patriarchy if you think communism is about enforcing monogamy and establishing strong families in Western societies. Go consult a dictionary.
Enforced monogamy just means everyone eventually has to pair up, not that you would be forced to date any specific person.
Feminism is government intrusion. If you support feminism, you support government stepping in to "solve" problems.
That said, if we abolished feminism, as well as every other social welfare policy, society would have to return to a traditional patriarchal order.
Classic feminist shaming language. Female mating habits are naturally discriminatory and ultimately disruptive. If strong families are the backbone of strong societies, then female mating habits should be regulated for the benefit of all.
Give it up dude. You will die alone. And that's even okay, because your DNA which has absolutely no value for humanity (I would even say it is bad for humanity) and it will vanish from the gene pool.
You are not alone because of feminism. You are alone because you don't have anything to offer. If a woman with your characteristics would pass you on the street, you would be disgusted by her and so are women with you. Now stop asking the government to regulate your private life like the good little communist you are.
How do you know I'm even single? As if being in a relationship and supporting enforced monogamy are mutually exclusive categories. Grow up.
This shows a complete ignorance of evolutionary biology. And is a false equivalency. No woman has any difficulty attracting a partner, but many men do.
How is demanding the abolition of feminism not demanding the end of government regulation in private life? Since feminism is just that, government regulation.
Again, patriarchy is not communism. Please use a dictionary.
How many times am I going to have to repeat myself?
You are single. Everyone here knows it.
There are a lot of 300 lbs lonely single mothers out there which would be more than happy with a catch like you. You both deserve each other.
Tell me how enforcing to date someone and enforced monogamy aren't regulations of your private life. I'm more than happy to hear your "explanation".
Here is a documentary about a society you would like, Hutterites:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2omDlZlO_s
They have all your favourite policies. They are Conservative, they are Christian, they don't support feminism, women have nothing to say, a pure patriarchy, they enforce monogamy. And you know what they also call themselves, Communists. This is the society you want. A collective. A Communist collective.
That's one of the proposed policies on the incel party's platform.
The only thing that crashed the birth rates is the pill. Since the 1970s the birth rate hovers around 1.5 to 1.6.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91-209-x/2018001/article/54956/fig/fig-5-eng.gif
And the mantra "if you can't find a woman, you have nothing to offer" is even true today, feminism doesn't matter. Stop pushing away blame from you, when you are the cause and the solution of your problems.
I would the same thing to a woman. You're making it into a men vs women thing. The number of young people which aren't in a relationship isn't only because men are alone. The number also went up for women.
It's not half. It's 2.4 vs 1.5. And if you read even the article linked by OP you will see that Muslims which are born in Canada have more or less the same birth rate than a White Canadian woman. Only first generation immigrants have significantly higher birth rates.
And in the 1970s where Canada was 95% white the fertility rate was at 1.7 for White women. Today it's at 1.5. What a collapse.
And it's for all races, not only white people. And why the fuck should I give a shit about the fertility rate in the US?
Oh, what happened in 2007? Maybe there was a big recession which squashed millions of dreams ...
Bring back traditional catholicism and our birth rate will skyrocket plus the new generation will be based
In my naive way I think that if our culture shifted so that marriages were 7 year renewable contracts, and the wee peasants who think they deserve a $30,000 wedding ceremony were publicly shamed for being vapid and financially irresponsible, then more people would be getting together.
https://bestasianwomen.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/asia8-820x1024.jpg
Forced... Forced I tells ya
All of your posts are so mind numbingly retarded I hope to god you're just some fat incel troll who doesn't believe a word of it.
Given that half of Canadian women are fat, ugly, angry and generally unpleasant, domestic abuse and male suicide will skyrocket.
You guys have such limited imaginations. It would be the sane, balanced right determining marriage and family policies, not the shrieking harpies of the left.
That's exactly the compromise position I've arrived at. I had a trip to Burma planned that got cancelled by COVID, but other than that I've made no unnecessary concessions to the government's medical tyranny regime.