Not even screaming Allahu Akbar while stabbing CAF members is enough to get terrorism charges through a Canadian court. Doubt that it will stick this time.
This is interesting because the logic they use to excuse antifa from being deemed terrorists is that they're not an organization and don't answer to a centralized command structure.
Meanwhile, the police have said they've found no indication that Vindman was acting as part of a group or organization. But he's being charged as a terrorist.
Seems the definition of "terrorist" includes "must be part of an organization" when it suits the commies, but doesn't include that clause when it doesn't suit the commies.
This is why we need laws against communists holding elected office or judicial/law enforcement positions.
When asked on Tuesday why Bissonnette was not facing terrorism-related charges, Thomas Jacques, a representative of the prosecutor’s office, replied: “The charges laid correspond to the evidence available,” said.
I wonder what evidence they have available, but are not sharing with the public, against Veltman.
Not even screaming Allahu Akbar while stabbing CAF members is enough to get terrorism charges through a Canadian court. Doubt that it will stick this time.
It's only terrorism if you're white
Tell that to Bissonette.
Tell that to Trudeau.
This is interesting because the logic they use to excuse antifa from being deemed terrorists is that they're not an organization and don't answer to a centralized command structure.
Meanwhile, the police have said they've found no indication that Vindman was acting as part of a group or organization. But he's being charged as a terrorist.
Seems the definition of "terrorist" includes "must be part of an organization" when it suits the commies, but doesn't include that clause when it doesn't suit the commies.
This is why we need laws against communists holding elected office or judicial/law enforcement positions.
I don't know. They tried to charge the guy who stabbed the CAF members with terrorism and failed.
And Bissonette wasn't charged at all.
Don't think it's a political thing. Maybe he said something dumb during the arrest or interrogation.
They asked him if he was proud to be a boy, and he responded "Yeah, sure I guess".
He had an Arab friend who said he never said anything bad about Muslims. Another friend said he was having steering problems with his vehicle
It was originally reported that he hit the family while they crossed the street. CBC has now reported the truck hopped the curb to hit the family
It’s been reported:
Insurance will be examining his vehicle. I wonder if he was fucked up or having vehicle problems.
He has not secured a lawyer.
And the definition of "terrorism" get watered down even more.
White people don't have to scream it. Bissonette wasn't charged with terrorism either for shooting up a mosque.
I wonder what evidence they have available, but are not sharing with the public, against Veltman.
Dude, that was in 2017. Trump was already elected as president. There was even a media outrage over it because he wasn't charged with terrorism.
Yeah but he was a Trump supporter, thus conservative.
Ultranationalism and talking about how non-white people are destroying everything seem to be Conservative talking points.
Bets they link him to here even if he never existed here
It's the only open site with free speech. They mastermind a lot of things you hear about in the media.
Like the "it's ok to be white" posters and "islam is right about women" - all came from pol.