You never addressed my comments related to PREP and HIV.
And you never responded to my statement that AIDS used to be a death sentence and is now manageable due to the treatment you are unhappy about. Are you saying the treatment should not have happened?
Significantly more effort was afforded to using Africa as Guinea pigs
You brought up Africa, not me. It's not part of my discussion because I don't have time to investigate extra unsupported claims. As you say: "YOU will not direct my conversation in the direction that is most covient to YOUR conclusions."
Discrepancies and Pfizer data
The only specific study you quoted went active in July in California, long after the Epsilon variant appeared in California. Searching at that web site (clinicaltrials.gov) - which you supplied - reveals another 70 Pfizer covid-19 studies, so until proven otherwise I'm going to credit the different dates to those 70 other studies.
Facts
The fact you need to supply is the one that shows a new covid variant was found in a vaccine trial participant. For all I know that is actually the case, but there's no proof in any of the opinions you've expressed. Your statement that "Variants appeared in places that first introduced Vaccines" implies that they appeared after the vaccines were administered but so far that's just your opinion.
Unless you can connect the dots by providing verifiable facts - never mind Africa, Grey's Anatomy, Bill Gates, supposed pre-assigned narratives in media, and all the other unsupported opinions you express - I'm not going to participate in this discussion any more. You're too emotional.
And you never responded to my statement that AIDS used to be a death sentence and is now manageable due to the treatment you are unhappy about. Are you saying the treatment should not have happened?
You brought up Africa, not me. It's not part of my discussion because I don't have time to investigate extra unsupported claims. As you say: "YOU will not direct my conversation in the direction that is most covient to YOUR conclusions."
The only specific study you quoted went active in July in California, long after the Epsilon variant appeared in California. Searching at that web site (clinicaltrials.gov) - which you supplied - reveals another 70 Pfizer covid-19 studies, so until proven otherwise I'm going to credit the different dates to those 70 other studies.
The fact you need to supply is the one that shows a new covid variant was found in a vaccine trial participant. For all I know that is actually the case, but there's no proof in any of the opinions you've expressed. Your statement that "Variants appeared in places that first introduced Vaccines" implies that they appeared after the vaccines were administered but so far that's just your opinion.
Unless you can connect the dots by providing verifiable facts - never mind Africa, Grey's Anatomy, Bill Gates, supposed pre-assigned narratives in media, and all the other unsupported opinions you express - I'm not going to participate in this discussion any more. You're too emotional.