Nearly 50 per cent of Canadians say they can’t afford meat
(ipolitics.ca)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
They do. And with any luck with the Maunder Minimum coming we can dump enough Co2 into the atmosphere to head off another cold epoch and my grandkids won’t face mini ice ages like the founding fathers did around 1750.
Is a colder earth better for civilisations? Or a warmer earth? Or is the current average temp just right?
Should we have lower co2 than we do now? If so, how many ppm on average?
So you're one of the few who believe there's a causal relationship between the Little Ice Age and the Maunder Minimum despite the former starting before the latter. Time will tell, and within the next few decades, I guess.
I have no idea if the maunder min causes or contributes to ice ages. I’d have to look at the data. I don’t really fancy the sun reducing in power. How that can’t make the earth just a tad cooler.
Think of the positive, if the ice caps melt all that extra warm land to build, replace any flooded land by area and discover and we can finally settle the debate on all the weird chambers and geological hot springs under the ice.
As far as I can tell you are not relying on any input from experts.
Let’s get to the point. The ‘global warming’ thing is either happening, will happen, or is isn’t happening or won’t happen in the future.
If it isn’t happening/will happen, then all is well.
If it is happening/will happen, what do you propose mankind does about it?
So how much lower do you posit average co2 ppm should be? Or higher?