This is one of the reasons you cannot trust the medical profession. Money and politics has tainted them. Their bullshit Hippocratic is meaningless when they're willing too lie and obfuscate the truth about dangerous substances like these vaccines.
There is no first class research to back up his claims. It's as though he was a civil engineer who was telling builders it's OK to use copper and aluminum instead of structural steel in their high rises.
He would like to be considered a professional but he refuses to adhere to professional standards. Time will tell if he is right, but so far he's wrong.
Except, of course, that virtually none of the "Peer reviewed studies, data, observations, experiences, easily verifiable information" makes it into the OmegaCanada discussions.
Instead we get personal opinions unsupported by any kind of reference material. The journals and papers from the institutions most qualified to publish are only referenced if they can be misinterpreted, and their conclusions are ignored.
This is one of the reasons you cannot trust the medical profession. Money and politics has tainted them. Their bullshit Hippocratic is meaningless when they're willing too lie and obfuscate the truth about dangerous substances like these vaccines.
For context: the link is about one doctor.
Dr. Brian Phillips registered as a physician 5 years ago and completed a specialty in family medicine in 2018. He has no special expertise in virology, immunology, infectious diseases, or public health policy. https://doctors.cpso.on.ca/DoctorDetails/Phillips-Patrick----Brian/0310033-109364
There is no first class research to back up his claims. It's as though he was a civil engineer who was telling builders it's OK to use copper and aluminum instead of structural steel in their high rises.
He would like to be considered a professional but he refuses to adhere to professional standards. Time will tell if he is right, but so far he's wrong.
Except, of course, that virtually none of the "Peer reviewed studies, data, observations, experiences, easily verifiable information" makes it into the OmegaCanada discussions.
Instead we get personal opinions unsupported by any kind of reference material. The journals and papers from the institutions most qualified to publish are only referenced if they can be misinterpreted, and their conclusions are ignored.