:)
What booster are you on Tuchodi?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
This analogy is written by an immature individual without a science and math education.
No Tuchodi, the analogy here is you fell for a scam. Fauci and Pfizer sold you an mRNA injection that was never able to get FDA approval since 1990. They sold you this based on the 95% relative vaccine efficacy, after a 4 month trial. Now, after 2 years, the absolute efficacy is 2%. And you fell for it.
From the start u/canuck55 and other logical minded individuals did not believe accepting an injection after a 4 month trial period was reasonable. But you did Tuchodi, you fell for it.
Not everyone understand statistical analysis but others understand how easy it is to manipulate you with it. You were sold you an experimental injection, and you didn’t question anything.
At a guess I'd imagine you back up about 0.01% of your speculations.
Did the facts hurt your feelings Tuchodi? You were sold an experimental vaccine and told it was safe after a 4 month clinical trial.
And it works. Too bad you continue to look the other way.
07 May 2022 BioMed Central, publisher of scientific journals: "VE against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
April 21, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "A BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 booster after either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 primary course substantially increased protection" https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451
May 4, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "After two doses, both vaccines were equally effective against severe disease caused by the omicron variant." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202061
Your “studies” count SUSPECTED COVID CASES and SUSPECTED COVID DEATHS”. None of your suspected Covid cases or deaths were PCR tested. Do you find that scientific Tuchodi?
Your scam “studies” have to use OLD 2020 DATA from when EVERYONE WAS UNVACCINATED!!! LOL
You post garbage science and trash methodology that you don’t have a clue how the conclusions were made, you just copy paste a headline. But in reality your study’s method is “inferential, or estimated, or fictitious” and has to use outdated data that hides the real 2022 catastrophic truth. Your data is fraudulent. Just like you.