You data demonstrates how vastly superior natural immunity is compared to the vaccines. (you always denied this longstanding scientific fact until now, treating is as a conspiracy theory in a desperate attempt to misinform people)
It proves natural immunity persists beyond 6 months where immunity from vaccination does not.
A few months ago you were fine with people who were vaccinated over 6 months ago with "negligible" protection getting a free pass to fly, while the naturally immune with "strong effectiveness" were treated as a second class.
It's time to begin apologizing for spreading misinformation and disinformation.
Am I wrong or did you say a few weeks ago that you're not boosted? When did you get boosted? When will you be getting your next booster?
"you have to live through covid to get it. Over six million people haven't managed that."
Source please? This is more disinformation.
"it's at 46.1%, compared to stronger protection from everything else except doing nothing and failing to get boosted."
Right, two shots gives no protection but prior infection gives "strong effectiveness".
"You can call it that if you want but you're wrong."
You still think natural aquired immunity is a conspiracy theory? Do you not agree with the science of immunology?
Side question, are you still overweight? Because if you are you should be cut off from society until you get with the science and get healthy. Being overweight is a primary co-morbidity and a massive strain on the healthcare system. It's an active choice you make every single time you overeat and eat unhealthy food.
Do you routinely exercise? If not same deal, you should obviously be cut from non essential activities especially eating at restaurants and flying.
I'll never understand hypocrites who expect others to take steps but refuse to take steps themselves, its incredibly entitled and selfish.
Right, two shots gives no protection but prior infection gives "strong effectiveness".
You are purposely ignoring that there are three other scenarios in that paper that give better protection than prior infection. Vaxxers and anti-vaxxers agree - for different reasons - that two shots six months ago are no longer very effective.
You still think natural aquired immunity is a conspiracy theory?
Unless you have had covid or are up to date with your shots you have no immunity to covid, or at best very little.
Do you not agree with the science of immunology?
I agree.
Side question, are you still overweight?
Nice to see you sober. Have you quit beating your wife?
"previous infection alone ... showed strong effectiveness"
You data demonstrates how vastly superior natural immunity is compared to the vaccines. (you always denied this longstanding scientific fact until now, treating is as a conspiracy theory in a desperate attempt to misinform people)
It proves natural immunity persists beyond 6 months where immunity from vaccination does not.
A few months ago you were fine with people who were vaccinated over 6 months ago with "negligible" protection getting a free pass to fly, while the naturally immune with "strong effectiveness" were treated as a second class.
It's time to begin apologizing for spreading misinformation and disinformation.
Sure, except that:
you have to live through covid to get it. Over six million people haven't managed that.
it's at 46.1%, compared to stronger protection from everything else except doing nothing and failing to get boosted.
?? See response above. It's only better than doing nothing or failing to keep up with your shots.
You can call it that if you want but you're wrong.
... following public health guidelines instead of Facebook and Twitter experts. Still am.
Am I wrong or did you say a few weeks ago that you're not boosted? When did you get boosted? When will you be getting your next booster?
"you have to live through covid to get it. Over six million people haven't managed that."
Source please? This is more disinformation.
"it's at 46.1%, compared to stronger protection from everything else except doing nothing and failing to get boosted."
Right, two shots gives no protection but prior infection gives "strong effectiveness".
"You can call it that if you want but you're wrong."
You still think natural aquired immunity is a conspiracy theory? Do you not agree with the science of immunology?
Side question, are you still overweight? Because if you are you should be cut off from society until you get with the science and get healthy. Being overweight is a primary co-morbidity and a massive strain on the healthcare system. It's an active choice you make every single time you overeat and eat unhealthy food.
Do you routinely exercise? If not same deal, you should obviously be cut from non essential activities especially eating at restaurants and flying.
I'll never understand hypocrites who expect others to take steps but refuse to take steps themselves, its incredibly entitled and selfish.
You are wrong.
"Natural immunity is the antibody protection your body creates against a germ once you’ve been infected with it." https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-natural-immunity-what-you-need-to-know.
You are wrong.
You are purposely ignoring that there are three other scenarios in that paper that give better protection than prior infection. Vaxxers and anti-vaxxers agree - for different reasons - that two shots six months ago are no longer very effective.
Unless you have had covid or are up to date with your shots you have no immunity to covid, or at best very little.
I agree.
Nice to see you sober. Have you quit beating your wife?