That's too bad. That's one of the reasons I wanted to read the decision and see if the hype was warranted.
They do say that the probation condition that forced the pastor to speak a disclaimer discrediting himself every time he spoke publicly was unconstitutional, but the government conceded this point so this is probably not a very useful precedent.
Yes unfortunately it was based on the order being too broad to capture Pawlowski, not about the measures being illegal.
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/therebel/pages/60733/attachments/original/1658509958/MEM%28C%29-2101-0234AC_34411_.pdf?1658509958
That's too bad. That's one of the reasons I wanted to read the decision and see if the hype was warranted.
They do say that the probation condition that forced the pastor to speak a disclaimer discrediting himself every time he spoke publicly was unconstitutional, but the government conceded this point so this is probably not a very useful precedent.