Huh? Your response should have been specifically directed to kids 13 to 18, as that is the age group that this report is talking about. You’re off on a tangent.
Just remember folks, V&C1 doesn't offer a shred of proof for their fantasies.
How about a shred of proof for your fantasies now rather than deflecting?
Hey Twochodes,
LET’S DISCUSS THE FACT THAT TWO EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTIONS LOWERS SPERM COUNT IN HEALTHY MALES, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT MANDATING THIS INFERTILITY.
LETS DISCUSS how there is a total absence of data on sperm count after each additional booster. Lets discuss this TwoChodes!
TwoChodes, LETS DISCUSS the facts that Dr. Lourenco, Trudeau’s Director General of Health Canada, confirmed that the mRNA vaccines are as low as 20% effective.
When asked if the vaccine efficacy failure had been observed during longer more scientific clinical trials, would it have been authorized? Dr Lourenco answered: “It would not. No”.
You deflected to something completely different, as you just did again with this statement, like you have a script ingrained in you by CTV News that you automatically regurgitate.
Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
Huh? Your response should have been specifically directed to kids 13 to 18, as that is the age group that this report is talking about. You’re off on a tangent.
How about a shred of proof for your fantasies now rather than deflecting?
See folks? I provide quotes from the study and a link to the whole thing so anyone who wants to can look for themselves, and DD ignores it.
Some people are incapable of discussion.
Hey TwoChodes, Let’s discuss the fact that the CDC Director lied to you April 2021: and promised you that “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15JAcTz2GX/this-is-tuchodis-expert-/c/
Why don’t you want to discuss this CDC lie?. It appears some people are incapable of discussing uncomfortable facts.
The real story folks: https://archive.ph/wQAKO
Why are you still compulsively using the word “Folks”?
Your mental illness is worsening
Cause I'm not commenting for your benefit.
Hey Twochode!
LETS DISCUSS THE FACT THAT YOUR CDC expert just CONFIRMED THAT UNVACCINATED AND VACCINATED HAVE THE SAME GUIDANCE NOW.
Got a quote or a link?
Of course not. It's V&C1. Doh!
Hey Twochodes, LET’S DISCUSS THE FACT THAT TWO EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTIONS LOWERS SPERM COUNT IN HEALTHY MALES, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT MANDATING THIS INFERTILITY.
LETS DISCUSS how there is a total absence of data on sperm count after each additional booster. Lets discuss this TwoChodes!
You left out "temporary"
THANK YOU FOR CONFIRMING THAT YOU ENDORSE GOVERNMENT MANDATED “TEMPORARY” INFERTILITY.
TwoChodes, LETS DISCUSS the facts that Dr. Lourenco, Trudeau’s Director General of Health Canada, confirmed that the mRNA vaccines are as low as 20% effective.
When asked if the vaccine efficacy failure had been observed during longer more scientific clinical trials, would it have been authorized? Dr Lourenco answered: “It would not. No”.
LET’S DISCUSS THIS VACCINE FAILURE TWOCHODES.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15JAOKImJj/dr-lourenco-trudeaus-director-ge/c/
See folks? V&C1 has forgotten all about boosters.
You deflected to something completely different, as you just did again with this statement, like you have a script ingrained in you by CTV News that you automatically regurgitate.
I provide links and quotes. You say "How about a shred of proof"
It's pretty clear.
Links and quotes about 11-18 year-olds, which is what this post was discussing? No, you didn’t.
Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
Every link I supplied comes through OP's post.
The tweet he supplies does not mention 11-18 year olds. It is about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://mobile.twitter.com/ReutersFacts/status/1560276653133049857
The tweet links to a Reuters piece about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
And your supported arguments are all macro. You can’t support your fantasies, otherwise.