Nothing to see here, mmkay
(youtu.be)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
To all the weasels out there that shill for pharma here's a way out for you that will satisfy everyone.
I'd be more apt to believe in the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine if they did a study of everyone who has received a shot vs the those that have not taken one and compared their 1 and 2 year (upcoming) outcomes. Show me groups by number of shots.
Show me the deaths, shingles, mycarditis, pericarditis, embolisms, thrombosis, diabetes, obesity, covid etc counts. Let me compare side by side. Don't try to hide anything. Don't try to use weasel words to get out of having to tell the truth. Don't exclude anybody. Give it to me in an excel and live free.
With large enough groups like we have we don't need to know the individual prediliction to illness. Comparing the millions on both sides of the shot/no shot groups would tell us the truth.
This would show us easily if the vaccine is the culprit or prove what you faithfully believe without evidence that the shots are safe and effective (at changing targets).
Only this is sufficient to satisfy statistical truth. Every other lie or study is only trying to hide that truth.
That would be 8 billion people all told. Are you sure that's what you're asking for?
What Bobby said is correct, except when he said “everyone.” You could do a study of a few million and extrapolate the results to the entire population within a minuscule margin of error. That’s the beauty of stats.
This is how science has always been done, yet not for covid vaccines.
I want the truth not some distilled lies. Show the data.
This is the nursing instructor, isn't it?
I got as far as 10 minutes. He had made the point that there are excess deaths that are not being attributed to covid, without showing or even claiming that every corpse is tested for covid, and you would need that if you were going to tell people that any of those deaths were definitely not associated with covid.
Then around 7:30 or so he's talking about a journal article from the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology about the need for genetic testing for high performance athletes, and he claims they said ""Up to 80% of athletes who die suddenly had no symptoms or family history of heart disease", which it does not. You can go to Facebook and find the link in his comments, or you can read it here: https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac080/6596972?login=false#357293069
Very weak argument. This is official government data. You’d prefer a modeling study paid for by Pfizer?
How many? Show your source(s).
Compare that to the 6 million plus who have died from covid.
Folks, it's almost like some people are upset - or maybe even crazy with fear - because they cannot have perfect protection from a global pandemic.
Your individual opinion is noted.
Folks, more people are dying because the healthcare system is compromised. Emergency rooms shutting down, examinations are delayed, treatments are delayed, surgeries are delayed, "Even a four week delay of cancer treatment is associated with increased mortality across surgical, systemic treatment, and radiotherapy indications for seven cancers." https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4087
From nursing teacher's list of links at the Youtube version of the video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wLu98NygrA&t=6s): "Figures released last week showed that a record 29,317 patients were forced to endure 12-hour waits in accident and emergency in July, a rise of a third in a month. The number of 12-hour A&E waits rose 33 per cent in July, with a record spike of 7,283 – up from 22,034 the previous month. Before the pandemic, the figure for the same month was just 450." https://archive.ph/GxNzg#selection-2615.0-2627.157
Does the nursing teacher talk about those factors? No. He assumes there are people with spare time who could be assigned the task of figuring things out. Do we know that he is right?
No one is arguing about the numbers.
Show the folks that it's more dangerous than the virus.
Except that you WERE arguing the numbers. So I had to correct you. You would have edited your comment, as usual, had I not quoted it.
Where?