That sounds like anyone can post. You're going to need proof that it's trustworthy. I suggest you start here, on Quora: "It’s not trustworthy because there is no fact checking and no credential checking. It’s not unusual to see contradictory answers to a question. It’s not unusual to see a clueless opinion presented as fact." https://www.quora.com/Is-Quora-trustworthy
And Bobbysgoat prefers it to the other links in this thread: the American Heart Association, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association, etc.
Quora is publicly vetted. If you think they are wrong post there
That sounds like anyone can post. You're going to need proof that it's trustworthy. I suggest you start here, on Quora: "It’s not trustworthy because there is no fact checking and no credential checking. It’s not unusual to see contradictory answers to a question. It’s not unusual to see a clueless opinion presented as fact." https://www.quora.com/Is-Quora-trustworthy
And Bobbysgoat prefers it to the other links in this thread: the American Heart Association, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association, etc.
That explains a lot.
Well the CDC and CMA have masters. You have masters to the voices you share
Quora is like Twitter. You choose the truth by public opinion rather than shadow councils sharing their paid for opinions.
Does what you've said prove he's wrong? Not so much.
You should try your opinion on Quora and see how fast your opinion survives.
You heard it here folks. They're doubling down and going with Quora over science.
https://citizenfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/covid-protection.jpg
This is what "science" does to people's understanding of informed consent when not vetted by public knowledge.